-
Essay / Defend the Trees: Don't Let 'The Lorax' Be a Prediction of the Future
Soil erosion threatens modern society as surely as it has other long-vanished civilizations. Although more than 99% of the world's food comes from the soil, experts estimate that each year many hectares of cropland are degraded or lost due to rain and wind sweeping away the topsoil. In fact, past societies collapsed or disappeared completely because of soil problems. Easter Island in the Pacific is a famous example, as is the Mayan civilization. There is plenty of scientific evidence that even a small change in soil can be harmful. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay The changes in temperature, but especially precipitation, to be expected due to global warming are subject to major uncertainties for several reasons. Also the effects of climate change on soils through CO2-induced increases in growth rates or water use efficiency, through sea level rise, through decrease or climate-induced increase in vegetation cover, or by a change in human influence on soils due to changes. In the options for the farmer, for example, each may well be more important than the direct effects on soils of higher temperatures or greater rainfall variability and greater or lesser total precipitation. But the most dangerous changes to soils are those caused by direct human action, such as deforestation, chemical emissions and urban construction. As you can read in the article The Mirror of Our Destiny, “the parallels between Easter Island, the Mayans and the modern world are frighteningly obvious. ". However, the media focus on climate change, fuel problems and forest fires, but not on soil because it is less spectacular. But the reality is that in Iceland, for example, about 50% of the land has ended up in the sea. And an area large enough to feed Europe has been so badly degraded that it can no longer produce food, according to researchers. UN figures. We must therefore act before it is too late. Is it possible to balance human society with the ecological needs of our planet? I've been thinking about this question for a while now. Icelandic society only survived on a significantly lower standard of living. Maybe we Americans take too many things for granted. Nature is not simply a storehouse of resources to meet our needs. Rather, it is a highly integrated and interdependent functional system on which all life forms, including soil, water, plants, animals and humans, depend for survival. This is why it is necessary that we treat the natural environment with love and respect. The recent Paris Agreement on global climate change represents a key step in recognizing the limits to human actions, but the challenge of respecting these limits remains underestimated. Society and conservation science have tried unsuccessfully to meet this need. In my view, there is a need to achieve a technological “greening” of the economy, which involves developing ways to reduce our dependence on non-renewable energy and resources to produce goods and services. The first step is to recognize that interests other than human interests must be taken into account. taken into account. Then, faced with the immense uncertainties regarding the.".