In modern America, the means and efforts people go to simply to obtain a gun are far beyond from what they were in the 1818s and 1900s. According to studies by the Giffords Law Center, "more than half a million firearms are stolen and then resold each year." Clearly, this makes it a major contributor to gun violence, crime, and gun-related deaths in the United States. That being said, I think it is safe to say that subsequent Supreme Court decisions related to this law no longer apply in today's America. .Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayThe purpose of the Second Amendment being "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" (US Const. amend.II) comes accidents, abuse and exploitation of the rule of self-defense. Last year, an incident was reported in which a father unintentionally shot his two-year-old daughter in the stomach while repairing his gun. She lived, but this event shows how the law itself does not guarantee security and can do more harm than good in certain situations. In 1934, the National Firearms Act was ratified to further regulate weapons after seeing an increase in crime rates. However, I consider this attempt at regulation outdated because, as of today, access to black markets and other illegal sellers has become easier and more important than it should be. Much like the Articles of Confederation, the rules relating to this right must be updated and/or amended to better control the use of firearms. When our founding fathers created these amendments and rights, they may never have had in mind the idea of ​​a fully automatic system. assault rifle firing hundreds of bullets per minute, whereas at the time their arsenal consisted of rifles that had to be reloaded after each shot. With this in mind, it is understandable that the laws regarding this right were not as strict. But we need change now more than ever, because with all of these mass shootings and gun deaths occurring frequently, it's only a matter of time before a gun falls into the worst possible hands. At a music concert in Las Vegas in 2017, gunman Stephen Paddock opened fire on a crowd, killing 58 people and injuring hundreds more. Investigators found 23 firearms in the hotel room where he was staying and 19 others in his residence. There is no regulated gun tracking system, so there was no way of knowing how he got the guns until gun dealers who sold guns in the pens be questioned about it. They said he passed all the necessary background checks, but that didn't stop him from killing people with his Second Amendment right. That said, it's clear that our current decisions don't do enough to prevent this kind of thing from happening again and again. Another argument to highlight is the ease with which young people can obtain a firearm. In places like California, you barely have to be over 18 to buy an armalite rifle or shotgun, but you have to be over 21 to buy a handgun. But what meaning does this have? Obviously one can do more damage than the other, so why is it easier to buy a more powerful one from the start. A.