Table of ContentsIs the U.S. Food Supply Safe for Human Consumption?The Issue of Genetically Modified FoodsGovernment Action to Improve Safety food safetyThe effect of new legislation on the food supplyIs the food supply Supply in the United States Safe for human consumption? Food is one of the most important needs that everyone needs in daily life. Food safety is a very sensitive concept as it poses a huge risk to human life if not properly addressed. Unsafe food causes many diseases, ranging from diarrheal diseases to different forms of cancer. On the other hand, a secure food supply supports a country's economy, other sectors such as trade and tourism, and even contributes to food and food security. A secure food supply also stimulates sustainable development. This article presents an argument about whether the food supplied to the United States of America is safe for consumption, as it could be. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay The issue of genetically modified foods Reports from consumer rights advocates indicate that 5,000 people die each year from contamination of food while 76 million people fall ill due to food contamination. While consumer advocates are recommending that the U.S. government take more steps to ensure the safety of food supplied across the country, fewer steps have been taken, with the new voluntary inspection gradually failing. Policymakers are very concerned because natural contaminants could also be a cause of the lack of food safety in the United States. Natural contaminants could include genetically modified organisms found in both cuts of meat and vegetables. It is also said that terrorists could take advantage of the food supply to harm the people of the United States. Terrorists may do anything possible to sabotage the United States' food supply, including food contamination (Hosansky, 897). Advocates claim that the use of genetically modified foods may be another cause of food contamination, Companies supplying the genetically modified foods have argued against the idea that the foods are unsafe for consumption by explaining that the foods have been tested more thoroughly before being released to the market. Additionally, the companies demonstrate that there is no evidence that genetically modified foods have harmed consumers in the past. It is also argued that there are agencies that play a role in ensuring that genetically modified foods are safe for consumption and the environment (Monsanto Corporation). Apparently, natural causes of food contamination due to the effect of genetically modified foods are not a problem. Guanine is the cause of food contamination in the United States. Food safety in the United States is primarily disrupted by factors such as food poisoning, which is common in most deaths and illnesses. Genetically modified foods do not influence food safety in the United States because the agencies responsible for genetically modified foods study the composition andnutrition between genetically modified foods and traditionally obtained foods. Additionally, companies producing genetically modified foods have employed trained personnel to regulate the contents of the foods so that they do not harm human beings. Reports on government action to improve food safety indicate that the United States government's efforts to improve its inspection systems have caused food poisoning incidents to increase across the country, sparking fear among consumers. Additionally, food processing plants have received greater attention to ensure the elimination of pathogens. However, the country has recorded outbreaks of food poisoning in recent years. Latest reports indicate that progress has been made in the fight against food poisoning, but no strategy has been developed that could lead to total eradication of the entire menace of food contamination in the country. Food safety program directors also say there are still many gaps in the food safety system, indicating that the United States government has not done enough to reduce the contamination problem. eating. With the threat of terrorism, the country is exposed to many risks related to food security since terrorists strike the least expected sector of the economy (Hosansky, 899). Other reports indicate that the federal government is working to reduce the number of illnesses linked to foodborne pathogens resulting from food poisoning. It is noted in an article on food safety that the government provides U.S. consumers and retailers with information on safe food handling practices. In addition to educating its citizens, the United States government has made food safety one of the key objectives of the health sector, an approach that aims to promote health and prevent disease in the United States of America. The 2010 initiative's goals included reducing the number and rates of infections caused by foodborne pathogens by 50 percent, increasing the percentage of the population that follows food safety practices, and reduce the risk of human exposure to pesticides. in food (Fisher and Gale). The initiative set up by the US government provides a counter-argument to claims that the ruling government is not entirely responsible for tackling food contamination in the country. Categorically, the United States government has done little in managing food contamination across the country. country. The issue remains alarming since the strategies were only put in place in 2010, perhaps to show some sense of responsibility in the face of the threat. Apparently, the government needs to come up with many more strategies that would reduce the rate of infections resulting from food poisoning to zero. The government should also take steps to ensure that gaps in the food security system are addressed. Such gaps open the way for opportunists such as terrorists who would like to see an entire community perish from food poisoning. The Food Safety Modernization Act requires that the food safety system be strengthened, an action that is not fully implemented by the government. The law does not require action to be taken after a problem arises, but rather means to prevent such problems. The FSMA requires that.