-
Essay / Taboo Review: The Hidden Culture of the Red Zone by Fouzia Saeed
In something not to be touched (fact, talked about), she studies the lives of the residents of Shahi Mohalla in Lahore. Shahi Mohalla is a place inhabited by a city of people providing entertainment, dancers, players and music writers. This group is experienced in preparing all forms of entertainment and normally their forte is preparing sexual services for the clients who attend the Mohalla. It is a place that has been a starting point of mixed feelings for everyone who knows about this subject. he. The Mohalla has always been well guarded under levels of false beliefs and perceptions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayDr. Saeed's work was the first step open to change in the direction of going or transmitting the false belief and bringing into existence and constitutes a true account of what life is like in the Mohalla. The impulse necessary to carry out this observation operation can entirely be related to. In the opening book section, Dr. Saeed discusses the association 1 of dance and music with sex work in our society. In her own words, she recounts how she had to adapt to this association 1, which hindered her desire to learn and lead different forms of Greek and Latin dance. As a woman, she faced stop signs because of one of the most clichéd terms in our society: “achay ghar ke ladkian yay naheen karteen” (daughters from good families do not give in in such operations). This thing gave her a goal and she worked hard to enter into these unexplored lands dominated by the science group in Pakistan. The book is the result of so much research. An interesting and comprehensive quality of the book is its non-judgmental process about the people of Mohalla. Dr. Saeed worked to make observations about these people as individuals living in circumstances that had nothing to do with him. She acted between them and with these people so as not to get an answer as to whether they are good or bad or how they can be eliminated. Rather, it fixed the point at which the rays come together to make observations about their lives with a colorless sort of feeling or opinion which is most important to all scientific work. In this way, his work is true and is true. It is neither caused by a reaction in something else, nor by a lower and less important position in the direction of the thing spoken of and therefore free from any false belief or power to be conscious of it. She stated what she saw and left it to the reader to form a judgment 3 if it cannot burn without one. Reading the book, among all the scientists as if not colored by feelings or opinions, one sees signs of Dr. Saeed. position as a human rights activist. These signs always appear as if in the right context 4 and make the reading experience meaningful enough. Supporting his position, Dr. Saeed asks some very well-founded questions in the book. Questions that go straight to the middle, to the heart of how we, as a society, manage to live with our 2x quality examples. As an example of these questions and thoughts, Dr. Saeed asks why a woman who has a bad reputation and uses little is labeled as a bad person while her person who buys goods from stores is dismissed with a small , little slap on the wrists. It asks a question about why normally people who misuse and weak.