Throughout history, exploration has been a part of many cultures and history of North America is no exception since many countries like France, England and the Spanish pushed through certain obstacles to try to conquer the continent. Colonists crossed the Atlantic Ocean in search of different things for their own benefit and each country had a different perspective in colonizing North America. But of course, these perspectives would significantly alter and ultimately determine the fate of the New World. Such that these differences brought both certain disadvantages and advantages in their mission, England having more freedom because of the way in which it governed itself in relation to its king. Unlike “Say no to plagiarism”. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Spain and France, both of which were ruled by authoritarian leadership that served only the crown. By 1763, the English had conquered North America by defeating Spain and France in the French and Indian War and were cultural pioneers in allowing others a chance to join their colonies. Therefore, the English were the superior colonists in achieving their goals. in the New World because of the effectiveness of their methods. There are three main reasons that support this claim. First, the English welcomed other immigrants, which contributed to the growth of their population, but also to their diversification in several ways. Second, they were self-governing and were allowed to set up local governments and representative assemblies that allowed them to rule over each other as long as they were loyal to the crown. Finally, their economy was extremely diverse and offered agriculture, fishing and trade. Not only that, but they also had access to exports such as rice, timber and tobacco. First, the English welcomed other immigrants, which helped their population grow. Now, because the English were the last to colonize, they didn't care much about religion, unlike wealth and agriculture at that time. For example, the English sent massive numbers of settlers who had little interest in evangelism, unlike the Spanish who wanted to convert the Indians to Christianity. The English welcomed many immigrants from different places who wanted to settle, whether for gold, farming, or to follow their own religious beliefs that might have been forbidden in England. In 1754, the population of the English colonies was 85% white settlers of English, Irish and Scottish descent, leaving the remaining 15% to the Germans and Dutch. Although the English colonies were diverse, they also had 287,000 slaves out of 1.5 million imported into the 13 colonies. In comparison, unlike the English, France and Spain were opposed to immigration, thus limiting their population growth in the New World, which was a disadvantage. For example, France experienced very slow growth early in its colonization, having no more than 5,000 settlers in 1672 and fewer than 40,000 in Canada in 1734. Additionally, Spain had greater growth problems demographic because she was more focused on her wealth and military quest. Still, they had quite a large population in Florida, Texas, California, and Mexico. The Englishbeing the most populous, they also had the greatest diversity in terms of population sources, as settlers were able to recruit middle-class farmers and traders. Second, the English were self-governing and were allowed to create local communities. governments and representative assemblies which allowed them to impose themselves on each other as long as they were loyal to the crown. This is not much different from today since the thirteen colonies had a system of town meetings. Similar to what we have today, including county government in many states. After the thirteen colonies were subject to a legislature, the British Parliament which closely resembled today's Congress. This also allowed for a president chosen by the king who had power similar to that of the King of England. The structure of government in the Thirteen Colonies was developed in a thoughtful manner that benefited the wealthy of that era. Which seemed selfish, but in my opinion was necessary to help England prosper in the New World. In addition, the colonies were protected by the British Empire which helped them in their trade by reducing clashes with pirates or warships. By carrying the British flag, it would increase their chances of getting help from the British when needed. On the contrary, the French colonies were subject only to the French king and therefore had no political rights or representative government. Basically, it limited them in such a way that they felt restricted. Unlike the English who could improve their government through meetings, which the French could not do without authorization. Third, their economy was extremely diverse and offered agriculture, fishing and trade. Not only that, but they also had access to exports such as rice, timber and tobacco, which were the main source of trade at that time. In terms of agriculture and trade, the English were arguably the best at it. What distinguished the English from the Spanish and French was that they were not interested in making Indians work for them or establishing a trading post; all they focused on was making money and one way was to become a farmer. They thrived on cash crops and traded these products in the market, but they also had enormous quantities of staple crops that nourished their own. For example, the English had plantations in Maryland, Virginia, and the Carolinas that produced crops such as indigo, tobacco, and rice. While the middle colonies like New York, New Jersey, and Delaware provided the primary means of transportation for these cash crops. In the same vein, the French tried their hand at agriculture but ultimately failed by attempting to establish plantations in the Mississippi valley which were in reality not very profitable. As for the Spanish, they had huge connections in the trading market, but were heavily regulated by the Spanish military to ensure that no one cheated them. For all the success the English were having, they of course had some things that put them at a disadvantage, such as cutting off all relations with the Native Americans by trying to drive them from their homeland. Similarly, the Spanish tried to convert the natives to Christianity, but in the end, the soldiers ended up trying to kill them. Unlike the English and Spanish, the French offered respect to the Native Americans, which allowed them to form alliances that.