In his article “Health Care Is Not a Right,” Leonard Peikoff protests: “No one has a right to the services of any individual or professional group simply because he desperately wants and needs them. them." Peikoff explores the immorality of providing health care to underserved people – instead of letting them support themselves by purchasing their own health care – as an attack on their American rights. Taking the opposite position, “Universal health care: a moral obligation? Author Ronald Pies decides: “Government must play a key role in ensuring that basic health care is both accessible and affordable for all” In reality, the. Pies's fixation on the moral imperative to provide universal health care closely resembles the logic behind Obamacare; at the same time, the conflict between the rights of illegal immigrants and their new access to health care in the United States is one; extrapolation of Peikoff's reasoning. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayProviding affordable health care to more Americans than ever before, Obamacare is rooted in the belief that all Americans have the right to health care. President Obama promotes the Affordable Care Act, urging: "Let's help our fellow Americans get covered." Let’s give every American a fighting chance in today’s economy” (whitehouse.gov). It seems consistent with traditional American principles of equality and justice that health care, as a means of preserving a high quality of life, belongs to all American citizens. When equality among individuals exists, equal rights should also exist. To prevent the exclusion of people from seemingly basic rights based on their socioeconomic status, Obamacare provides indiscriminate health care; that is, the Affordable Care Act makes health care accessible to all American citizens. Many people argue that in the name of unity and equality, we must care for our fellow human beings and provide for them what they cannot provide for themselves. As a result, the government appears to bear primary responsibility for the well-being of citizens, even going so far as to enact laws that add health care to the list of basic human rights. In conclusion, moral responsibilities convince many people to support the integration of universal health care. On the other hand, beliefs like Peikoff's readily call into question cases such as extending health care access to illegal aliens residing in the United States. He argues that health care is a privilege rather than a right, on the grounds that people have the right to act, not to receive services. In other words, while Americans are entitled to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” they are not entitled to rewards. Thus, preserving the American concept of “rights,” universal health care must not exist. Additionally, Peikoff argues that legal U.S. citizens are not entitled to free health care. Illegal immigrants are certainly not entitled to it either. For these reasons, Peikoff's logic is completely at odds with the idea of ​​providing health care to all. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Universal health care has its supporters and critics. Some, like Ronald Pies, argue that the government is morally obligated to provide universal health care;..