blog




  • Essay / Anti-dialogical theory versus dialogical theory

    If we see the world in two terms, we must identify with only one. Therefore, if there are oppressors and oppressed, then we must either be oppressors or oppressed. Oppressed people know they are oppressed. They read Pedagogy of the Oppressed and find a new way to learn. They become participants and have value. Few oppressors consider themselves oppressors, and that's where the problem begins. Whether Freire is right or not, calling someone an oppressor is not a compliment. Who wants to be an oppressor? Well, Freire has the answer: “For the oppressor, what is worthwhile is to have more – always more – even at the cost of the oppressed having less or nothing.” Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay No one wants to be an oppressor. But once someone has something, it's hard to give it up. Overconsumption in most rich countries is proof of an oppressive nature. Even though we say, “I am not oppressing anyone,” we fail to take into account the situation of the vast majority of people in the world. Galeano's Open Veins and Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed relate to poor and persecuted individuals and present intriguing thoughts on how to liberate individuals. Which prompts me to take a look at my use of hardware products. For example, how much would my computer cost if the general population that made it had similar education and social services to mine? A similar investigation applies to my food, my clothes, and everything else in my house. Freire develops the hypothesis of “cultural action” or the techniques that individuals use to bring about social change. Freire isolates social activity into two kinds, “dialogical action” and “anti-dialogical action”. The theory of anti-dialogical action and its characteristics are: conquest, division, manipulation and cultural invasion which serves oppression. And the dialogical theory of action and its characteristics such as collaboration, union, organization and cultural synthesis serve liberation. Collaboration as a type of network liberation. This process does not occur through the juxtaposition of a messianic leader, but rather through the collaboration that occurs when a leader and the majority transmit and communicate with each other to achieve their common goal of liberating themselves and reclaiming the world , rather than adapting to it. This happens when they offer each other common trust so that progressive practice can come into being. Such a circumstance requires modesty and constant dialogue with each member. Along with collaboration, union is also necessary in case we want to accomplish a typical effort towards freedom. This suggests a type of social activity that encourages adherence to progressive reason without falling into ideological metaphor. Rather, reason is described as it could really be, as a human movement, not as a distorted event. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Dialogical activity additionally requires organization. in the case of staying away from the ideological control of the best. Organization is a fundamental component of progressive activity; it suggests a knowledge between activity and practice. The oppressed should not casually trust the authority of a revolutionary leader, just as they should not blindly trust..