The article discusses points made by Christopher Tomlins in his 1985 book, The State and the Unions, and the various reactions to Tomlins' criticism of the Labor Relations Act (NLRA). ). In his book, Tomlins argued that the New Deal essentially offered a false idea of ​​freedom for workers. Tomlins harshly criticized the NLRA as a set of rules and "constraints that would dampen worker activism and ultimately weaken the labor movement." » (1) In the book, Tomlins essentially predicts this trajectory of unions and how the NLRA will lead to a decline of the very rights it was intended to protect. Tomlins' book received both praise and criticism from leading scholars and provided the impetus for extensive debate on the issue of the decline of unions in the United States. The author's bottom line is that while there are viable arguments on both sides, the NLRA may not be solely responsible for the decline of unions. Tomlins' book was published in 1985, decades before the essay was written. The author provides a retrospective overview of how things have changed since the publication of Tomlins' book and how different factors may have contributed to this change, as well as how Tomlins' theories fit into the current climate.Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the Original EssayReviewThe author throughout the article suggests that even those who agreed with Tomlins' assertions in the s 80 have reason to reevaluate its potential for obsolescence and possibly misdirection. Jean-Christian Vinel's reviews of Tomlins' book emphasize the idea that the many years of conservative rule over time have fundamentally changed the debate around the system since its inception in the 1930s. Vinel points out that although the New Deal may not have lived up to its expected potential, it was a better proposition for workers and unions than the ideas of neoliberalism that currently dominate the political atmosphere. As a result, the author agreed with Vinel's arguments and took an in-depth look at how efforts to revitalize unions have failed over the years since Tomlins made his predictions. The author supports these views by highlighting the struggles between organizing with a core of grassroots activists, which was the direction the movement was taking, and the more militant approach of the pre-New Deal era. This struggle may seem like a confirmation of Tomlins' predictions coming true, however, there are other factors that were not predicted or taken into account by Tomlins. It all comes down to the internal weaknesses of the movement, which are a major factor in the failure to build a more activist movement, as well as the external weaknesses. Essentially, the author argues that internal weaknesses are further accentuated when efforts to amend the movement are greater. the NLRA and adopting other statutes to revitalize union power would be unnecessary. The author further highlights the idea that rather than focusing on the Wagner Act as providing counterfeit freedom, the official position of the labor movement is that the intent of the Wagner Act was thwarted by external factors such as the Taft-Harley Amendments, the politicization of the NLRB, and substantial intervention by the conservative judiciary. According to the author, none of the proposed amendments or policy solutions would help restore strong unions. Instead, asserts..