The recognition of same-sex marriage is a political, social and religious issue. It is for this reason that same-sex marriage is a very controversial subject. Legal recognition of same-sex marriage is commonly referred to as marriage equality. Many supporters of marriage equality argue that laws restricting marriage to only heterosexuals discriminate against homosexuals. On the other hand, supporters of same-sex marriage argue that it would destroy long-standing traditions and detrimentally alter the meaning of marriage. In this essay, I will argue for same-sex marriage. The mentioned arguments and others will be discussed throughout this article. First, I will discuss the reasons for marriage equality. I argue that marriage equality is in the best interest of family life. Allowing gay people to form stable, committed relationships through marriage would enable healthier same-sex relationships. You can't stop people from being gay, but giving them the right to marry can help them experience greater personal happiness. Studies have suggested that not only does legalizing marriage in a region generally make gay individuals in that region happier; it also makes them healthier physically and mentally and allows them to save money on health care (Hatzenbuehler, O'Cleirigh, Grasso, Mayer, Safren, & Bradford, 20012). I see no compelling reason to take away the joy gay people get from marriage, which is one of the many reasons I support marriage equality. Marriage naturally creates families; it provides the conditions for a healthy and beneficial environment for the education of children. Opponents of same-sex marriage often base their arguments on parental and religious concerns. Many argue that it is... middle of paper... me-sex marriage. However, marriage is not defined solely as a relationship between a man and a woman. The definition of marriage has varied throughout history. Depends heavily on the religious and political views of an individual society. Quote and quote changing the meaning of marriage would not harm the meaning of a marriage. It would still be the same binding contract as today. In conclusion, I argue that the ban on same-sex marriage is discriminatory. This measure is discriminatory because it deprives homosexuals of the many advantages enjoyed by heterosexual couples. The right to marry in the United States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. This has a lot to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I advocate for same-sex marriage. Freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.