Gun violence in the United States is the cause of thousands of deaths each year. These deaths are due to both homicides and suicides. Although gun violence is a national disaster, it is more prevalent in poor neighborhoods due to gang violence. To control the situation, the federal government, through Congress, attempted to implement gun control policies. Democrats considered liberal favor regulations on gun ownership, while Republicans considered conservative view gun control laws as an attack on Americans' rights. The media, as important players in disseminating information to the public, have sometimes lacked neutrality in their reporting. This may be due to what could be considered political interference. CNN, Fox News and the Chicago Tribune, among other major media outlets, have seen different facts presented in their reporting on gun control and the politics behind it. It has been observed that the media presents liberal and conservative ideologies instead of presenting facts from both sides. An analysis of the different reports from these media will highlight various biases such as manipulation bias, labeling bias, omission bias and finally source selection bias. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay The first bias one may note when reporting on gun control is the bias of source selection. This is when different media outlets deliberately choose to leave out information that is contrary to their point of view. Democrats managed to pass two priority gun control laws, but had no shortage of protests in the media. The media claims to be impartial, but their invitation to discuss gun control laws is a strong indication of their affiliation. Before the vote, CNN invited Democratic Rep. Lucy McBath to weigh in on federal background checks for gun ownership. The House representative lost her son to gun violence, and her emotional appeal was toward what she calls "finding a way, without infringing on citizens' Second Amendment rights." (CNN) She recommends background checks and screening, saying it would reduce gun deaths. On the other hand, Fox News invited House Representative Steve Scalise, Republican, on February 26, 2019 to share his views on gun control legislation. Steve, a survivor of gun violence, supports gun ownership because he believes gun ownership can help save lives. In his interview with Fox News' Brian, he was disappointed that Democrats didn't want to hear his reasons for making it easier for people to buy guns. (Fox News) Both media outlets describe their efforts to promote a particular program to their viewers. In this case, CNN viewers have strong opinions on gun control, while Fox News viewers are in favor of gun ownership based on what they receive from their news sources. 'information. Manipulative bias is another way the media manipulates information to advance their agenda. Gun control is a critical issue that needs to be debated soberly, but unfortunately, liberals andConservatives, through the media which support their policies, invent stories which correspond to their discourse. In an attempt to reduce gun violence, Democrats have proposed policies to make it difficult to own guns, which runs counter to Republicans. The Chicago Tribune, a famously conservative newspaper, wrote that: "Police wouldn't necessarily go after those who don't comply, but they could arrest anyone they stop who has an outstanding arrest warrant." » (Chicago Tribune np). This is seen as an attempt to show the chaos that would be caused by abandoning weapons. return to authority pending review. In an open forum with some of those affected by gun violence, CNN's Brooke Baldwin sought to air the stories of those affected and their grief. They relieved from the horror of losing people they know during a very emotional session. At the end of the interviews, Brooke mentions that "it's important to remember who you are and why you're in this fight." It is in no way a question of watering down the messages conveyed by the various media channels. What bias means is consistency in their reporting style which, in this case, is one way or another showing one side of the story and using the incidents as "evidence" of what 'they promote. The gun control debate has been marked by widespread bias by omission in the media. The media has been selective about who is asked to give their opinion on the issue. They have been astute about how the public perceives this sensitive issue from the perspective of the political divide they support. In 2018, after the Texas school shooting, people considered to have influence were invited into studios to speak out on the issue, while some of their social media accounts were highlighted on live television. CNN invited Mark Kelly to capture the mood of the event while trying to capture the mood of the event. Mark is a United States Navy astronaut and political activist. He is the husband of former Democratic House Representative Gabriele Gifford and personally a Democrat. In studio, Anderson Cooper asked Mark's opinion on President Trump's commitment to protecting children and making schools safe. He responded by saying: "I don't think I heard him say anything today that was a positive direction in taking this issue seriously...I think the only thing he said was that we should fly the flags at half-mast.” » (CNN) Objectively, the channel would have invited an opinion contrary to its opinion. Fox News, while highlighting the issue of gun policy, invited Tomi Lahren, Kayleigh McEnany and Charlie Kirk who strayed from the topic of banning or not banning guns and emphasizing the need to resolve cultural issues. Tomi says, “I think everyone here, because we are supporters of the First Amendment, believes that everyone, regardless of side, has a right to speak about these issues and that we can come to some sort of of consensus. This is a calculated move to dilute the intensity of the issue at hand and focus on other topics to illustrate to its viewers how the topic is less urgent or not as important as the party claims opponent. Another bias that the media does not try to hide is labeling. This is what the media personality or writer does, during a report, by introducing a character who would play the role of “expert” or “victim” to guide a conversation. Fox News, in an interview with.