Gun control has been a huge controversy for many years, so many people think that if we have strict gun laws, the rates crime rates will fall. Is it true that if we control guns, we control violence? Is gun control necessary? And what research and testing is needed to find the answer? These are just a few of the many questions I've come across while researching the topic, and I've found many explanations that help better understand gun control. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Being someone who is pro-gun always hears one of the biggest debates in society today regarding control guns with the famous quote from the National Rifle Association that says: "Guns don't kill, people kill." Guns were originally designed for the military, yes they were designed to produce a certain type of violence, but for strong defense against enemies. People today have taken guns and made them a bad thing, they are misused and they are a major factor in many crimes, from robbery to murder, and even suicides, but this does it mean that the fault should be placed on the weapon? Bill Whittle is an American conservative blogger and political commentator. After the 2012 presidential election, Whittle gave a speech known as the "Virtual President of the United States", in which he aimed to bring common sense to modern politics. He talks about how we deny the evidence by wanting to ban guns because we know deep down that we can't ban violence, murder and insanity, which are the real reasons for crimes. As I listened to his speech, I thought about how we believe we can control something like guns. Society will always look for something or someone to blame. Let's say we somehow found a way to control guns or even get rid of them altogether, then people will try to ban pocket knives, or even something. as common as a wrench or a hammer, we will always look for something to blame, something other than the obvious, that is, if someone wants to kill, they will find a way. The overwhelming need to ban assault rifles is an important topic when it comes to gun control, stating that they are dangerous and are constantly used in gun-related murders. fire. In 2016, there were 374 murders involving all types of guns, while murders with knives numbered 1,604, 5 times as many murders. So, does this mean we now need to control guns? Today, many of us think we have to choose a side: we either oppose guns or we support them. In a journal article written by Hugh Lafollette titled Gun Control, Lafollette explains that we do not need to decide whether we are for or against, but to decide "who can possess which weapons and under what conditions." Being pro-gun, I don't believe guns are a necessary action at all. To explain, I think we need to have a little stricter process when purchasing a gun, we should control the parts available to turn your gun into an automatic weapon, but we don't need to ban completely. I believe many other factors come into play when it comes to violencemilitary, including religion, race, age, poverty level, violent media, drugs and parenting. In 1992, the Bureau of Justice Statistics released statistics on teen homicide rates. aged 15 to 19 due to guns between 1985 and 1990, and the numbers more than tripled for African-American adolescents, while they barely doubled for adolescents overall. Per 100,000 adolescents taken as a whole, the rate was 5.8 in 1985 and increased to 14.0 in 1990, while homicides among African American adolescents were 37.5 in 1985 and increased to 105 .3 in 1990, meaning that most homicides involved African-American teenagers. This shows that race can be a huge factor when it comes to gun violence. The Bureau of Justice released statistics on the annual rate of handgun victimization from 1987 to 1992. They tested age based on their race and gender, white male, black male, white female, and a black woman, it started low, but there was a huge noticeable spike in all ages between 16 and 19, then it starts to decline from 20 to 24 up to 65 and up, but black men and black women continued to remain slightly higher than white men, and white females. (Carter) Today, racism is also a huge problem in the United States and causes a lot of controversy in our society, but in my opinion, if we could end all racism, it would also reduce gun crimes on fire. Video games have also shown a huge impact on teenagers over the past 20 years. Open-fire massacres, including the Columbine High School shooting and the Aurora Colorado movie theater shooting, had one thing in common: violent video games. Now, an Iowa State University psychologist says media violence, while a factor, is not the most important one. Violent games can arouse hostile impulses and aggressive behavior in the short term, but they are only short-term. But I believe that these little impulses aroused by violent games arouse other emotions that cause the person to reach the breaking point that leads them to commit these terrible massacres. When it comes to testing gun control, there are a few research methods that can be used, one is cross-sectional, that is, data collected in many geographic locations over the course of the same year. There is also time series research, which is data collected in a particular area over several years. Although these are some of the best testing methods, they also have some flaws. John R. Lott Jr wrote a book called More Guns, Less Crime Understanding Crime Laws and Gun Control, in his book he talks about these methods, he brings an example that helps us to understand the difficulty of testing gun control. “Let's say we decide to study an area that has high crime rates and passed stricter gun laws, which ultimately reduced gun crime, but was still higher than another area that had low crime rates and didn't adapt strict gun laws, right? so it looks like stricter gun laws always lead to higher crime rates? “Gun control is a never-ending fight, and I know there will never be a sure yes or no on banning guns, but I think we can improve the way they are applied, trying to get rid of the other factors involved./.