Table of ContentsIntroductionAdvantages/Disadvantages of Different Leadership/Management StylesConclusionReferencesIntroductionIn this essay I will discuss the following; leadership and management, advantages and disadvantages of leadership and management styles, the characteristics of a good leader and the differences between mentoring, coaching, project management and the learning organization. I will also express my own opinion on the debate between leadership and management. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get Original Essay Difference Between Leadership and Management: The main differences between leadership and management are: Leadership is a virtue of leading people by encouraging them. Management is a process of managing the activities of the organization. Leadership requires the trust of followers in its leader. Unlike management, which needs the manager's control over his subordinates. Leadership is an ability to influence others while management is the quality of decision-making. Leadership requires foresight from the leader, but management has a short-term vision. In leadership, principles and guidelines are established, while in management, policies and procedures are implemented. Leadership is proactive. Conversely, management is reactive in nature. Leadership brings change. On the other hand, management brings stability.Advantages/Disadvantages of Different Leadership/Management StylesAutocratic or AuthoritarianAn autocratic or authoritarian leadership style will include diktats and orders like telling assistants what needs to be done and how something is done. supposed to be done. This form is very useful when time is short, the leader has all the information necessary to accomplish a task and his staff is well motivated. However, the authoritarian style is negative when the leader can take advantage of the ideas of others. In fact, neglecting information from intelligent and responsible subordinates can be counterproductive in any situation. Democratic or Participative A leader's democratic or participatory approach to employee problem-solving ideas. He tends to involve his colleagues in the overall decision-making process. A leader is an ultimate authority in all matters, however, his tendency to involve his colleagues not only provides him with ideas that he might not have had, but also instills in his colleagues a sense of confidence, purpose and value. The participative leader also enjoys love and respect from his subordinates because he has the strength to collaborate instead of being insular and controlling. However, this leadership style is not appropriate when time is of the essence and the problem needs to be resolved immediately. Laissez-faire or delegativeThe laissez-faire or delegative leader leaves the task and the means to accomplish it entirely up to him. workers. Although leaders remain responsible for completing the task, decision-making and problem-solving are delegated to their subordinates. This leadership style relies heavily on a motivated and capable workforce that knows how to get things done. This form is based on the idea that a leader is not capable of doing everything and therefore must sometimes delegate tasks. But this style is not suitable when the staff is inexperienced or unskilled and when the leader has all the required information and the task must be accomplished immediately. So, in the real world of business, managers=8