In my opinion, each story in the book I, Robot has a unique plot. The most compelling story I felt was “Robbie”. This story develops around 2 protagonists, a nine-year-old girl named Gloria and a robot nanny called Robbie. It is interesting to see how the author tries to introduce the emotional quotient into a science fiction story while touching on the most crucial factor of the relationship between man and robot. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay It can be argued that the author could be one of the first minds to tackle the subject of bonds and emotions between robots and humans in an open debate. Robots can be caring, gentle, self-aware, creative, intelligent but also mean and rebellious. This isn't such a strange starting point when you see that almost all sci-fi stories featuring a robot up until this one was published were of the "robot turns on the creator" variety. The author's achievements lie in the concepts. Without doubt, the brilliance of Asimov's imagination and his ability to see where the future will take me makes Robot a classic, rather than its literary merits. While he is certainly a great storyteller, there are passages of bad dialogue and exposition-heavy prose that take away some of the luster from the book. The narrator of this story – Susan Calvin begins the story by stating that robots are more than mechanical parts. A deeper narrative attempts to build on this claim that robots can only become an integral part of humans if we create space for them in our minds and hearts. Robots are made from metal, plastic, aluminum, gears, bolts, wheels, sensors, memory chips and other gadgets. Asimov's robots can be described as clumsy, hardworking, profitable, soulless, strong, fast, obedient, man-made, a better, cleaner, more human race than man. Robbie is a selfless robot who loves his master Gloria dearly. core and, within its capabilities, takes care of it all the time, as any typical nanny robot would. Even Gloria returns the favor and she plays with him all the time. Robbie plays outdoor hide-and-seek with demanding mistress Gloria and he lets her win all the time. This is the relationship they both maintained until a certain time. The human spirit is always looking for a better companion, a friend. He's trying to find the most resonant character to spend time with. This is one of the most important things to think about. Children in particular are known for bonding with anyone with minimal effort on either side. Asimov eloquently portrayed this in a direct dimension where the reader has only one way to understand the emotional intelligence of the two protagonists, with no room for multiple interpretations. There comes a time when the mother is not happy that her daughter is spending time with robots. To all, she finds this abnormal, as her daughter is not socially active among her human friends. Gloria obviously has control of the Robbie. It is obvious that the robot is not treated well and is sometimes taken for granted. This can be seen when it says: "She slammed her hand against Robbie's chest, 'Bad boy!' I'm going to spank you! ". The notion of being socially active is very important to be accepted by society. In the future, if robots are actually capable of doing the things mentioned inthis part of history, will humans consider them an integral part of society? I believe that in times like this, we will be on the verge of a major cultural shift on a global scale. This could lead to a new era in which we no longer consider playing with robots a taboo, or it could end up being worse. It’s a conflict focused on beauty. An interesting observation can be inferred from the robot Robbie, it could be Isaac Asimov's premonition that children in the 21st century might form intense emotional attachments to gadgets like the idiot box (TV) and cell phones . This story is a bit long compared to the other stories. It contains what should constitute a perfect novel. The right amount of technology, emotion at play. Creator of Robotics 3's most famous and important rule, Isaac Asimov is a writer and biochemist professor. Science fiction author Isaac Asimov changed the way the world viewed robots. Asimov saw the potential of robotics as more domestic: as a labor-saving device; the ultimate worker. For his imaginative robots, he created 3 simple rules that seem naturally suited to the world of literature. There should be no criticism about this. I'm surprised by these laws, even though they are fundamental in nature but rightly designed for his stories. Apparently, when these rules are brainstormed with real-world robots, there may be room for amendments. Law is an effective means or agency, which plays a decisive role in bringing about social change in the country or in any particular region. Therefore, we rejuvenate our belief that law has played a central role in bringing about changes in societal structure and relationships and continues to do so. Many real-world developments related to autonomous robots have taken Asimov's 3 laws into account, with necessary changes like the introduction of the Zero Law. . These autonomous systems have also led to a new debate about whether or not to instill morality, ethics, and emotional intelligence. These developments are purely focused on robots, requiring them to strictly follow Asimov's 3 laws. Some researchers do not want to believe in these laws and propose to design completely new ones. Some critics call Asimov selfish, or at least humans are selfish. The laws state that man or humanity must be protected at all costs. We can discuss the existence of nature. Because robots have been given an ultimatum to protect us, even if it requires sacrificing nature. One important exception is the growing number of robots specifically designed to kill humans. The United States, in particular, uses drones to carry out targeted assassinations in foreign countries. The legality, not to mention morality, of these actions is still the subject of fierce debate. From this perspective, we can cautiously conclude that we should not believe in these 3 laws but rather create a new one. And, perhaps, these conclusions are not without reason because, although most ethical problems can be resolved almost universally within a cultural framework, people have struggled for thousands of years to codify exactly what might be the underlying decision-making process, despite knowledge sharing. implicit ethics. Whether acting by consequence, rule or virtue, ethical judgment in the real world is not simple. Asimov also suggested that we humans follow something close to Asimov's 3 laws. So that this helps us take.