In the age of instant information supported by advanced technology, we might think that access to all data would be unlimited. After all, the Internet is at your fingertips. But the sad truth is that many countries around the world seek to limit external impacts and thus block Internet networks and censor content where possible. It is a platform for communication and dissemination of information through universal outrage. Yet, regardless of the benefits it presents to billions of users, there are obstacles that force citizens and countries to move forward and put Internet censorship into practice. Protecting internet freedom from the growth of digital dictatorship is essential to protecting the democratic system. Technology should encourage citizens to make their own social, commercial and electoral choices without coercion or hidden manipulation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayThe Internet has become the final sphere of public influence, and mass media have immense power to ensure that their platforms serve the public's rights. Laws that restrict broadcast media programs produced outside their own country are reasonable in some respects and not in others. The crucial question is how much information should be available on the Internet and whether there should be a restriction on certain information to be shared between followers and critics. Restricting audio content to a certain percentage can reduce the influence of hate speech in society or on social media when communicating with others. The concept that all speech is equal can be proven false when argued. For example, there are expressions or words that individuals use to try to suppress the right of others to speak. People can become targets of cyberbullying and discriminatory comments, which shouldn't be the problem. These methods should not be allowed in virtual reality. The restriction process in this case creates more possibilities for equality. In today's world, parents are too busy managing work and home together. But, in this modernized technological society, they must protect their children from unhealthy inspirations. There is content all over the Internet that escapes parental filters. Innocent children can become targets of predators who may involve young children in child pornography or other malicious acts. Censorship allows us to protect children from getting into trouble. Limiting certain information and content in the media can help reduce the extent of conflicts it can create between different societies. For example, Netflix had to remove an episode of Hasan Minhaj's Patriot Act, which was critical of the country's authorities. Or it would have created a divide and Saudi Arabia would have banned the series in its country. Some restrictions are unreasonable, for example when it is the government that decides what information people can access, then there is no individual responsibility for its actions. Instead of being individuals, restriction turns people into products. We have already seen the impact of this censorship in China. If someone adds anti-government, violent, or sexual comments, the content is automatically removed. Do this several times and the account will be deleted. It is also a violation of privacy because it monitors all sites visited byindividuals. When censorship begins to hinder any form of content because it does not imply a moral standard or transgresses someone, then few commercial prospects become accessible to all levels of society. Organizations can no longer advertise themselves because their advertising might upset someone. Additionally, it closes trade for some countries. For example, Facebook is blocked in China, where it could have gained millions of users and profit. This creates a sphere in which our activities are controlled by others, so those who speak loudest will normally have the most control. Many countries, such as Canada, have laws that state that foreign films must have artists from their country to be released in their own country, which is a huge market for celebrities and the nation. While protecting the country's unique culture. Some states have completely shut down their external media, such as South Korea and Cuba. Countries like Tunisia prevent citizens from viewing revolutionary documents. Less than 40% of all residents have access to the Internet. I don't think restrictions on web and country access to content will remain effective with the expansion of online media and technology in recent years. Due to some inventions, it cannot control users not to access specific content. For example, hiding IP addresses with VPNs or proxy services is the best choice for fetching content blocked in certain countries, as it allows tunneling (port forwarding) traffic through an encrypted connection and exiting a other side. Users can also change the DNS server on the home router. So the remote server thinks you are connected from the correct country and it will just work. The use of all these services is so widespread that it is impossible to stop it, they are difficult to trace and block. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, culture is the soul of a nation. As countries become more unified economically, nations need strong national cultures and strong cultural representation to maintain their authority and sense of individuality. Undeniably, some have argued that the global impact of globalization is manifested in the reaffirmation of local cultures. For example, television shows, music and all other externally produced content strongly influence the culture of a foreign country and can harm one's own cultural identity. But in my opinion, a better understanding of foreign culture certainly does not mean a weakened stature for others. Throughout history, many different traditions have developed together and created opportunities to flourish. The exchange of ideas is important for the development of a culture or a nation. We can create rules that meet the needs of the nation without imposing integrity or values ​​on others. I'm not saying that all forms of content should be allowed in society; there should be specific laws for different content depending on who can watch or hear it. And the imposition of restrictions is also not under control due to emerging technology. Now anyone, anywhere can access anything available on the Internet. But it can be great if parents, government or teachers are involved in teaching young people to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate content and the importance of their own culture. Works Cited., 16(2), 129-142.