On March 20, 2003, President George W. Bush and his administration, fearing nuclear and biological weapons of mass destruction, declared the war against Suddam Hussein and his government. diet. The majority think that Hussein's ouster was a good thing, but the question of "was the war with Iraq really necessary?" » Still persists. I believe that war should only be used if there is immediate danger to those going to war. I have a just war theory view on the war with Iraq and I believe the war was not just because I don't see how it meets all the criteria of war theory just. For a war to be just, it must have a just cause, it must be a last resort, it must have a reasonable chance of success, it must be proportionate and it must have good intention. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The first of the criteria of just war theory is that there must be a just cause. More than 16 years after the start of the war and 8 years after its official end, there is still a glaring lack of evidence of the existence of so-called weapons of mass destruction. David Kay, who at the time of the war was head of the CIA's Iraq Investigation Group, tasked with finding alleged weapons of mass destruction. appeared before Congress 6 months after the war began and reported his team's findings thus far. Kay said the team found no substantial evidence of weapons storage, while warning there could still be a threat because the investigation was not yet complete. There is no doubt that Hussein had to go, but according to the Council on Foreign Relations, the administration had exaggerated how much of a threat he actually posed. Omar Taspinar told the CFR that no one in the countries bordering Iraq and in Europe considered Hussein a real threat and believed he could be contained. Jhon Nixon, a former CIA analyst who questioned Hussein about several different events, Nixon reported that when he questioned Hussein about his intentions regarding chemical and nuclear weapons, he certainly did not expect to hear this that he had done, the supposed leader of today's greatest threat. to the American people had no intention of using weapons against us. Hussein told Nixon that the American people had made a serious error of judgment because we had not listened and tried to understand. To me, this is proof enough that Hussein and his regime posed no immediate threat to us and those around him. Alongside a just cause, we also need comparative justice. This means that the consequences of war against Iraq must outweigh the benefits of not going to war and leaving them alone. There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein was an evil human being who repressed his people, but Iraq before the US invasion is much better than it is today. The death toll from the war stands at more than 4,000 and nearly 32,000 injured according to casualty status provided by the US Department of Defense; it is a tragic event of war which could have been avoided. There must also be good intention. According to General Tommy Franks, the United States wanted to end Hussein's regime, eliminate the threat of weapons of mass destruction, drive terrorists from the country, and lead Iraq on the path to democracy. Hussein has been eliminated and the world is better off, but weapons of mass destruction have never been.