In this class session, we continued to examine “Inductive and Deductive Reasoning,” but this time, with a surprising ideology. This ideology is none other than the reasoning of Induction, proposed by the ancient philosopher “Plato” (429-347 BC). The other being the reasoning of Deduction, proposed by the ancient philosopher “Aristotle” (384-322 BC). Which brings me back to my point, that prehistoric beliefs began to align with current beliefs. The definition of “Science” could not even be understood before these pioneers gave it meaning. I learned that both observation methodologies (qualitative and quantitative) can be used effectively to arrive at certain conclusions and/or results. Quite simply because with “Qualitative Observation”, a scientist can make hypotheses based on his own observation about an object and/or a theory. For example: if I had to decide whether a loaf of bread is still edible or not. I could check to see if mold has started to grow or not. As the mold would show the effect of eating the moldy loaf of bread can lead to “food poisoning”. I still don't understand what the "empirical" terminology in science refers to. From what I've gathered so far, I think defining is the act of a person applying their previous knowledge and gaining knowledge. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayTo gain knowledge while conducting specific experiments, observations, and models. However, to be able to fully understand this definition, I would use my dictionary as a resource. Because the meaning would be simple and direct. On the other hand, “Quantitative Observation” requires a scientist to make hypotheses, using a scientific tool and/or instrument. For example: if I have a fever, I can use a “thermometer” to find out my current body temperature and then find solutions to bring it back to normal. “No experiment can ever prove me right; a single experience can prove me otherwise.” - Albert EinsteinI believe this quote lent its definition to that of "William Harvey" (one of the world's greatest scientists). Harvey was responsible for the discovery of the blood circulatory system and its functions, as he carried out research and experiments to prove his theory as law. He would have explained in a detailed account every aspect of the said blood circulatory system and its functions. For example: blood vessels, veins, valves, heart and capillaries. Obviously, without Harvey's experimental acumen, the human population might not have known that the heart has four chambers, consisting of the right and left atria and the right and left ventricles. Not to mention the four valves of said heart; Tricuspid valve, mitral valve, aortic valve and finally the pulmonary valve. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Personalized Essay Each part of the circulatory system has a very important function and its discovery has been very beneficial to 21st century science and medicine. The question of the human circulatory system and its functioning strongly aroused my interest and made me want to know more about this system. That said, I am very grateful to profound philosophers such as: Harvey, who is said to have explored and criticized the phenomenal elements and their relationship to the current universe...