-
Essay / Rhetorical Analysis of Identity Discourse by Andrew Solomon
When people decide to have children, they never expect to be the rare parents whose children are born with differences from their own. These differences could be disability, gender identity, or even ability. What happens when these parents end up having children who are different from them? Andrew Solomon, “writer and professor of politics, culture, and psychology, and professor of clinical psychology at Columbia University,” decided to research those “parents who not only learn to manage their exceptional children, but also find deep meaning in doing so.” therefore". He talks about his research and time spent studying the subject of parents whose children have differences with them. Which verifies to the audience that he is knowledgeable about the subject he is discussing. He also explains how he writes for the New York Times, which also verifies its credibility with the public Using neo-Aristotelian criticism, I will examine Andrew Solomon's use of rhetoric to persuade people to love others because of their differences. I will “determine whether or not this goal was achieved or what happened as a result of the rhetoric.” Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned.” ?Get the original essay Growing up, Andrew Solomon faced his own mother's love because of his difference. Solomon's speech was aimed at those who struggle to love and accept those who have differences. differences with them. Growing up with identity differences from his parents is what led Andrew Solomon to seek the argument that we should love and accept people because of their differences. Solomon began researching this topic after writing an article for The New York Times about the deaf community. Through this, he learned how disabled people learned to have an identity with their disability. This is called “disability identity refers to the possession of positive self-esteem and feelings of connection or solidarity with the disability community.” This identity surprised Salomon, because he did not realize that "this phrase refers to the affirmation – rather than the denial – of one's reality as a person with a disability and the incorporation of this group membership into one's identity . » Through this research on disability identity, Solomon was exposed to how parents love their child who has these differences from them. He uses specific examples from his life and other families he has studied to draw his conclusion. There are two sides to the argument Andrew Solomon is trying to make. There are those who believe that we should love people because of their differences, and there are those who still see the differences between people as a reason not to love them. Throughout our history, we have become increasingly accepting of others and their differences. However, we are in a time in history where "although a majority of Americans embrace the country's increasingly diverse demographics and a vocal minority resists change with every weapon at their disposal. » Andrew Solomon argues that we should love our children because of their differences. The reason this argument gets backlash is because people think it's easier to love their child if they don't have differences. Their children are placed outside of what is considered normal. We don't necessarily want to go outside of the normal even if we claim to embrace diversity. Solomon argues that we must love people because of their.