An uproar of conflict has developed regarding the name of an NFL football team, the Washington Redskins. Although the conflict has been less public for years, the issue has been brought to light by a Native American activist. The activist demanded that the team lose the right to its name because of its racist slurs toward Native Americans. However, Dan Snyder, the owner of the Redskins, flatly refused to change the name. In the 21st century, many changes have taken place in society and the recognition of discriminatory activities is certainly part of this change. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The Washington Redskins team name could be considered offensive to Native Americans. Not only the name, but also the logo are clearly linked to Native Americans. Some say the term “redskin” is just as derogatory as the N-word toward black people. Both terms have histories that are not meant for casual conversation. Unfortunately, the N-word is used almost as a daily greeting. The mistake is that the vernacular of ordinary people is changed casually and without thought. Redskin should not be subjected to the same error and implemented in communication between people because there would be no progression of society through the ages. Yet where is the line between the offensive and the harmless when such problems arise? While it's glaring that the football team didn't choose the best name for themselves, one possible factor could be over-exaggeration about this whole debacle. the Canucks, the Vancouver hockey team; it's a nickname. Canadians too.[1] The other teams haven't changed their names even though they make fun of a certain group of people. A small percentage fighting an entire population might not be enough to replace the way things have been for years. For example, the Yankees won't change their name because someone says it's offensive and others might disagree with them. However, the term "redskin" might be a representation of courage and strength in the eyes of some others. There is a boundary between what is accepted and what is not, but no tie-breaking criteria are indicated. So, confusion is constantly happening, which is creating all of these controversies. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay The Washington Redskins shouldn't have to change the name of their team that has been around for at least 80 years. If there was no problem why are people demanding a football team revise their precious name. The word Redskins does not match the skills the team displays through its games. Dan Snyder stated in a letter to fans that the name was never a label. It was and continues to be a badge of honor… It is a symbol of everything we stand for: strength, courage, pride and respect…[2] Over the years, the team has proven that it deserved to be linked to Native. Americans in a positive way. The fact that Redskins is a derogatory term is true, but it has become something more than what it started with. So the Washington Redskins shouldn't change their name.