Table of ContentsIntroductionBodyConclusionIntroductionHave you ever wondered why some people engage in criminal behavior while others do not? The answer lies in the social interactions and influences they experience throughout their lives. Differential association theory, developed by Edwin Sutherland in the 1930s, suggests that criminal behavior is learned through socialization processes. In this essay, we will explore several situations that illustrate the principles of differential association theory. By examining these examples, we can better understand the application of the theory in various contexts and its implications for society. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayBodyAn example of a situation that fits the differential association theory is gang involvement. Gangs often provide a breeding ground for criminal behavior because individuals who join them are exposed to a culture that normalizes and encourages illegal activity. According to this theory, individuals learn criminal behavior through their interactions with gang members who constitute their primary reference group. These interactions involve the transmission of values, attitudes and techniques necessary to engage in criminal activities. Research conducted by sociologist Robert Sampson supports the principles of differential association theory in the context of gang involvement. Sampson found that people with greater exposure to gang members and activity were more likely to engage in criminal behavior themselves. This suggests that socialization processes within gangs play an important role in determining an individual's propensity to engage in criminal behavior. The implications of this example are profound. By understanding the influence of differential associations on gang membership, society can develop targeted interventions aimed at disrupting these socialization processes. Prevention programs that provide positive alternatives and promote prosocial behavior can help individuals break free from the cycle of crime. Drug addiction is another situation that illustrates the theory of differential associations. People who abuse substances often do so as a result of exposure to peers who use drugs or alcohol. Through repeated interactions with these individuals, they learn the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors associated with substance abuse. A study by sociologist Karen Parker found a strong correlation between peer influences and adolescent substance abuse. Parker's research found that teens whose friends engaged in substance abuse were more likely to develop similar habits themselves. This supports the principles of differential association theory, as individuals learn and adopt behaviors through their social interactions. The implications of this example highlight the importance of positive peer influences and the need for prevention and intervention programs targeting at-risk individuals. By creating environments that promote healthy relationships and discourage substance abuse, society can mitigate the impact of differential associations on substance abuse patterns. White-collar crime, such as fraud or embezzlement, is often committed by individuals in positions of power and authority. The theory of associations.