IntroductionWalt Whitman and Carl Sandburg, two titans of American poetry, each contributed to the literary tapestry of the United States through their evocative depictions of life American. Whitman's "I Hear America Singing" and Sandburg's "Chicago" are vibrant celebrations of the American spirit, but they approach this subject through distinct lenses. Whitman's poem exudes a harmonious and optimistic depiction of the collective American experience, while Sandburg's work offers a more realistic and nuanced depiction of urban life. This essay seeks to explore the thematic, stylistic, and tonal differences between these two iconic poems, examining how each contributes to a broader understanding of American identity. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned"?Get the original essayBody Paragraph Whitman's "I Hear America Singing", originally published in his seminal work "Leaves of Grass", is an expression by excellence of his transcendentalist beliefs. and democratic ideals. The poem is structured as a catalog of diverse American workers—mechanics, carpenters, masons, and mothers—each contributing their unique “song” to the nation’s collective symphony. Whitman uses a free verse structure, which reflects the freedom and individuality he so fervently celebrates. His language is simple but profound, imbued with a sense of optimism and unity. The repetition of the word “sing” emphasizes the inherent joy and pride that Whitman associates with honest work and individual contribution. Each worker is depicted as an integral part of the American tapestry, reflecting Whitman's idealistic vision of a harmonious and egalitarian society. In contrast, Sandburg's "Chicago" presents a more complex and realistic portrait of American urban life. Published in 1914, the poem reflects the realities of an industrializing nation, capturing both the vitality and challenges of urban life. Sandburg opens with a series of epithets — “Pig Butcher for the World, / Tool Maker, Wheat Stacker, / Railroad Gambler and Freight Handler of the Nation” — which immediately establish the rugged character and industrious man of the city. Unlike Whitman's harmonious portrayal, Sandburg's imagery is raw and visceral, capturing the dualities of strength and struggle, pride and pain. The free verse structure of the poem allows for a dynamic and fluid depiction of the city, reflecting its constant movement and change. Sandburg does not shy away from the city's flaws, acknowledging its "malfeasance" and "brutality," but he also celebrates its resilience and unyielding spirit. This duality offers a more nuanced exploration of American identity, one that recognizes both the beauty and complexity of the country's urban centers. Despite their different approaches, Whitman and Sandburg use vivid and evocative images to convey their respective visions of America. Whitman's imagery is pastoral and idyllic, emphasizing the natural beauty of the land and the noble simplicity of its inhabitants. In contrast, Sandburg's imagery is industrial and rugged, capturing the raw energy and dynamism of urban life. Both poets, however, share a deep respect for the American spirit, celebrating the resilience, creativity, and diversity of its people. Their poems constitute complementary portraits of the nation, each highlighting different facets of the American experience. Another point of comparison lies in the poets' use of tone. Whitman's tone is..