Public Attitudes Towards Risk and How It Contributes to Vulnerability In the world today compared to decades ago, individuals may perceive risk in different ways due to factors such as experience and trust. These different perceptions that individuals have of risk can have positive and negative effects and can create or contribute to increased vulnerability of that individual or a community. Although risk perception is based on different factors from one individual to another, there are ways to address the negative effects and increase the overall perception of risk by the public as a whole. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayWhat is vulnerabilityVulnerability in the context of disaster management can be defined as “the diminished ability to an individual or group to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from the impact of a natural or man-made hazard. “The severity of a natural disaster depends both on the physical nature of the event, and on the social nature of the populations affected by the disaster. Although a population may be affected by a natural disaster, different people have different vulnerabilities than others. Some human factors that contribute to vulnerability are: wealth, education, governance, technology, age and gender. Risk perception Risk perception is the process of collecting, selecting and interpreting signals about the uncertain impacts of events, activities or technologies. These signals can come from direct experiences, such as witnessing a natural disaster, or indirect experiences, such as reading about a natural disaster in the newspaper. Individuals judge risk based on mental models and other psychological mechanisms internalized through social and cultural learning, reinforced by other communication processes such as media reports and influences from other individuals. An individual's perceptions may be different depending on the type of risk, the risk and social context, and the individual's personality. The role of direct and indirect experience Direct experience can have both a positive and negative effect on risk perception. If a person has direct experience with a natural disaster, they tend to overestimate the possible danger, while a person without direct experience may underestimate the potential danger. Previous personal exposure to a natural disaster can provide an example of a threat and demonstrate potential future risk. For this reason, previous personal experience may be positively associated with higher risk perception. An example of how lack of direct experience can affect an individual's risk perception comes from a study done on landslides and risk perception. The study included ten groups who were asked to complete a survey. One group was made up of residents of Montrose, Australia. These residents were informed by Lillydale Shire that there was a high probability of a landslide occurring and that there was a high chance of losing their lives if a landslide occurred. Although Montrose residents were aware of the high probability of a landslide occurring, they nonetheless considered the risk of a landslide a low probability compared to the risks oftravel (air travel, road accident, etc.). This can be explained in particular by the lack of personal experience of landslide risks. Although there are positive effects of direct experience on risk perception, there are also examples of negative effects. People who have been personally exposed to a natural disaster, but who have not suffered property damage or bodily injury, are likely to believe that a future disaster is unlikely to affect them, hence their perception of risk decreases. By examining both the positive and negative effects of direct experience on risk perception, it emerges that it is not the experience itself that shapes the individual's perception, but the severity of the personal consequences that he suffered during past events. Vicarious experiences include any source of media, education, and witness accounts of disasters. Vicarious experience can play a vital role in recalling a previous personal experience or a vicarious experience previously seen or heard, because the perception and awareness of risk, which are at their highest immediately after a natural disaster, s fade over time. A common practice essential for motivating individuals and communities to take protective measures is to help people recall the experience of a past natural disaster. This “window of opportunity” can be used in risk education and communication. The role of trust The role of trust is another important factor in the perception of risks related to natural disasters. In this context, it is about trust in scientific experts, in the authorities and in the protective measures put in place. Trust is used by individuals as a method to reduce the need to make rational judgments based on known information by listening and following what experts and authorities say. This can lead to a reduction in uncertainty, but if a person lacks confidence or if that confidence has been damaged, they may feel more unsafe. An example of trust affecting individuals' perceptions of risk is that if a community is protected by levees or dams in the case of flood protection, the individual's perception of the likelihood or severity of 'a flood diminishes and, therefore, one's willingness to prepare for that flood also diminishes. the possibility of flooding. Most people believe that it is the responsibility of authorities and governments to protect residents.Hurricanes and Risk PerceptionIn recent months, there have been numerous hurricanes in the United States, the most recent being Hurricane Michael, which struck the Florida Panhandle on October 10. 2018. Before Hurricane Michael made landfall, mandatory and voluntary evacuation orders were in effect in more than twenty-two counties on Florida's Gulf Coast, while most people chose to listen to the warnings to evacuate, others did not. The reasons can vary, from evacuation not being a financially viable option, or due to other contributing factors, a false sense of security, or a lack of trust in experts and authorities. When a mandatory evacuation order is issued, it may not be a viable option or may be difficult for people living below the poverty line, the elderly, or people with disabilities. These personal constraints lead some people to compromise their personal safety unless outside help or resources are available. These constraints increase the vulnerability of these..

Essay / Public Attitudes Towards Risk and How It Contributes to Vulnerability In the world today compared to decades ago, individuals may perceive risk in different ways due to factors such as experience and trust. These different perceptions that individuals have of risk can have positive and negative effects and can create or contribute to increased vulnerability of that individual or a community. Although risk perception is based on different factors from one individual to another, there are ways to address the negative effects and increase the overall perception of risk by the public as a whole. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayWhat is vulnerabilityVulnerability in the context of disaster management can be defined as “the diminished ability to an individual or group to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from the impact of a natural or man-made hazard. “The severity of a natural disaster depends both on the physical nature of the event, and on the social nature of the populations affected by the disaster. Although a population may be affected by a natural disaster, different people have different vulnerabilities than others. Some human factors that contribute to vulnerability are: wealth, education, governance, technology, age and gender. Risk perception Risk perception is the process of collecting, selecting and interpreting signals about the uncertain impacts of events, activities or technologies. These signals can come from direct experiences, such as witnessing a natural disaster, or indirect experiences, such as reading about a natural disaster in the newspaper. Individuals judge risk based on mental models and other psychological mechanisms internalized through social and cultural learning, reinforced by other communication processes such as media reports and influences from other individuals. An individual's perceptions may be different depending on the type of risk, the risk and social context, and the individual's personality. The role of direct and indirect experience Direct experience can have both a positive and negative effect on risk perception. If a person has direct experience with a natural disaster, they tend to overestimate the possible danger, while a person without direct experience may underestimate the potential danger. Previous personal exposure to a natural disaster can provide an example of a threat and demonstrate potential future risk. For this reason, previous personal experience may be positively associated with higher risk perception. An example of how lack of direct experience can affect an individual's risk perception comes from a study done on landslides and risk perception. The study included ten groups who were asked to complete a survey. One group was made up of residents of Montrose, Australia. These residents were informed by Lillydale Shire that there was a high probability of a landslide occurring and that there was a high chance of losing their lives if a landslide occurred. Although Montrose residents were aware of the high probability of a landslide occurring, they nonetheless considered the risk of a landslide a low probability compared to the risks oftravel (air travel, road accident, etc.). This can be explained in particular by the lack of personal experience of landslide risks. Although there are positive effects of direct experience on risk perception, there are also examples of negative effects. People who have been personally exposed to a natural disaster, but who have not suffered property damage or bodily injury, are likely to believe that a future disaster is unlikely to affect them, hence their perception of risk decreases. By examining both the positive and negative effects of direct experience on risk perception, it emerges that it is not the experience itself that shapes the individual's perception, but the severity of the personal consequences that he suffered during past events. Vicarious experiences include any source of media, education, and witness accounts of disasters. Vicarious experience can play a vital role in recalling a previous personal experience or a vicarious experience previously seen or heard, because the perception and awareness of risk, which are at their highest immediately after a natural disaster, s fade over time. A common practice essential for motivating individuals and communities to take protective measures is to help people recall the experience of a past natural disaster. This “window of opportunity” can be used in risk education and communication. The role of trust The role of trust is another important factor in the perception of risks related to natural disasters. In this context, it is about trust in scientific experts, in the authorities and in the protective measures put in place. Trust is used by individuals as a method to reduce the need to make rational judgments based on known information by listening and following what experts and authorities say. This can lead to a reduction in uncertainty, but if a person lacks confidence or if that confidence has been damaged, they may feel more unsafe. An example of trust affecting individuals' perceptions of risk is that if a community is protected by levees or dams in the case of flood protection, the individual's perception of the likelihood or severity of 'a flood diminishes and, therefore, one's willingness to prepare for that flood also diminishes. the possibility of flooding. Most people believe that it is the responsibility of authorities and governments to protect residents.Hurricanes and Risk PerceptionIn recent months, there have been numerous hurricanes in the United States, the most recent being Hurricane Michael, which struck the Florida Panhandle on October 10. 2018. Before Hurricane Michael made landfall, mandatory and voluntary evacuation orders were in effect in more than twenty-two counties on Florida's Gulf Coast, while most people chose to listen to the warnings to evacuate, others did not. The reasons can vary, from evacuation not being a financially viable option, or due to other contributing factors, a false sense of security, or a lack of trust in experts and authorities. When a mandatory evacuation order is issued, it may not be a viable option or may be difficult for people living below the poverty line, the elderly, or people with disabilities. These personal constraints lead some people to compromise their personal safety unless outside help or resources are available. These constraints increase the vulnerability of these..

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch