Table of contentsIntroductionWhy should post-secondary education be free?ConclusionReferencesIntroductionShould post-secondary education be free? This is the subject of my essay. Although many people may say that post-secondary education should be paid for, I tend to agree that post-secondary education should be free. In recent years, it has been common for adolescents to pursue post-secondary education in Canada. This is because people understand that education is extremely important. Plus, times have moved on. Therefore, if some students have just graduated from high school, they will not be able to cope with many different job requirements in the future. However, the cost of post-secondary education constitutes a major obstacle for young people. Large debts have become commonplace for graduates, creating obstacles where encouragement should instead be provided. Research has shown that education increases opportunities for students, improves the lives of all of us, and leads to greater overall economic strength for Canada. Given the importance of pursuing post-secondary education, free post-secondary education should be offered by the Canadian government. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayWhy should post-secondary education be free?First, if post-secondary education were free, there would be no student loans. Students will not worry about taking out student loans to facilitate their studies at their university. This ensures that students do not go into debt. Even after the person goes to school for their chosen program, they still have hundreds or even thousands of money to pay. And when you add to that all the other things you may have to pay for, it adds up to a considerable amount of money. And this can leave the student stressed. One of my best friends who attended his freshman year of college in 2017 said he fell behind and got low grades on his assignments. The reason behind his low grades was that he didn't know where he was going to find another $11,000 to pay for his tuition. And his parents weren't rich. In total, they won about $80,000. Second, if postsecondary education were free, it would not be limited to high-income students. Quality education is one of the public goods that every nation strives to provide to its citizens by adopting relevant educational policies. While in many countries, including Canada, basic education is provided by the state at largely subsidized costs, financing post-secondary education requires people to dig deep into their pockets, both in countries developing countries than in developed countries. From an economist's point of view, increasing the price of postsecondary education has the effect of decreasing the demand for a public good. In this sense, increasing postsecondary education fees would mean a reduction in accessibility levels. Many students who complete high school are forced to work because their families cannot afford to pay for college. Rising post-secondary education costs make them affordable only for wealthy people. This statement means that less fortunate people would not have the same levels of accessibility as more fortunate members of society. One of my mother's sisters whowas planning to go to College Humber had to start working two jobs as a cashier at a retail store and at a fast food restaurant at the age of 16 to get a decent amount of money to help her parents pay for her. Third, if post-secondary education was free, they would guarantee education. Free education is vital because it guarantees every student in a country a certain level of education. This means that every student has an equal chance to access this level of education on the same scale. And they have access to the types of degrees they would like to pursue in their programs, which include associate degree, bachelor's degree, master's degree, doctorate, and doctoral degree. One of my father's friends who lives in Canada said he wanted to do his master's degree in engineering because he wanted to make a lot of money. But he could afford it, so he had to take his bachelor's degree. Then as soon as he finished his 4 years at university, he quickly left to look for a job. And after saving a decent amount of money, he returned to do a master's degree. And he said it was worth it, but it was also kind of a waste of time. On the other hand, one could argue that post-secondary education shouldn't be free either. If post-secondary education was free. There are 3 reasons for this. The first is that because free post-secondary education can lead to overcrowded institutions/too many graduates devaluing the programs, students will not be afraid to take out student loans to facilitate their college education. This ensures that learners do not go into debt. Even after the person goes to school for their chosen program, they still have hundreds or even thousands of money to pay. And once institutions become overcrowded, the program you study can devalue. Many people who graduate from universities fail to land a job due to the small number of jobs but the large number of applicants. The second reason is that there will be financial irresponsibility. When students have debt, they learn many things about financial responsibility. A student loan is a graduate's first vital financial transaction, and making the payments teaches them a lesson about paying off debt for the future. Additionally, when a student pays off their debt, it helps them build credit. If universities and colleges were free, these lessons would not be learned and it would be more difficult for graduates to earn good credit. And the last reason why post-secondary education should not be free is the poor quality of education. Free education can change the quality of education in the long run. This is because classes will be filled with many people, requiring them to have limited resources.ConclusionIn conclusion, some people may feel differently about free postsecondary education for good reasons. I somewhat believe that post-secondary education should be free because there will be no student loans and there will be a guaranteed education for every student who enrolls in the college or university of their choice . Even if they can't make post-secondary education free. They should reduce the amount you pay for your tuition. These are the reasons why I think post-secondary education should be free. ReferencesArcher, J. (2014). Evidence of free higher education. Guardian Higher Education Network. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2014/feb/24/evidence-free-higher-educationBarr, N. (2003). The economy of,, 93(2), 249-252.