blog




  • Essay / Analysis on how the philosophies of John Locke inspired Simon Bolivar to fight for Venezuela's freedom

    Simon Bolivar is a Creole who grew up in a wealthy family. Bolivar devoted his time and efforts to fighting for Venezuela's independence from Spain. To do this, Bolivar was inspired by the Enlightenment ideas of John Locke. John Locke explains the state of nature in which people find themselves. The state of nature is when people are able to do what they want without the control of a government. However, his enlightened ideas state that people must follow government rules and regulations in order to stay safe under the law, but they must have their needs met. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayAccording to John Locke, if the government does not follow what the people have asked and demanded, the members of society have the capacity to overthrow the government and regain political control. Creoles and other members of society struggle to gain independence and freedom from their Spanish governments, but Locke's Enlightenment ideas help them better understand what they should and should not do. when governed by a government. "We have already seen the light and we do not wish to return to darkness..." (bolivar)Simon Bolivar discusses the situation in which the Creoles and the Spanish find themselves. He describes how the Creoles were able to see freedom in the past and almost achieved it. However, they were prevented from achieving their goal of obtaining freedom and peace from the Spanish. “...whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery by arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people. » (Locke, 2). John Locke here explains what the people can do when the government fails to fulfill its duties to the people. If the government attempts to take and ruin the people's property, society has the ability to overthrow the government because its natural rights are not respected and there is no compromise between the people and the government. Therefore, Bolivar and Locke have the same ideas when it comes to government control. They both understand what could happen if the government did not respect the natural rights of the people and the consequences that could result. On the other hand, Bolivar reveals the idea that Creoles are cut off from all sources outside the world. their lands, but Locke spreads the idea that there is a way out of material and communication. The Creoles had great difficulties “As I have just explained, we were cut off and, as if distanced from the world in relation to science. of the government and administration of the State” (Bolivar, 4). The Creoles had no way of being part of the Spanish government, nor the possibility of participating in trade. The Spanish had blocked any communication the Creoles might have to attempt to reach. Additionally, they could not have had the ability to be merchants or even traders because Spain was so miserly. They kept all their attention on how the Creoles worked, but never on their desirable needs. Therefore, Bolivar were merchants or even traders because Spain was so greedy. They kept all their attention on how the Creoles worked, but never on their desirable needs. Therefore, Bolivar expands on the idea of ​​how Creoles were mistreated, even in government areas. Locke states: “…no one can be excluded from this state.