Examining the perspectives of Elliot Turiel and Albert Bandura on how children develop a sense of right and wrong is fundamentally the same, but not exactly the equivalent. According to Bandura's moral enhancement hypothesis, "individuals are thought to abstract and integrate information encountered in various social experiences, such as exposure to models, verbal discussions, and disciplinary encounters." Children use these things to express their own ethical progress. Following Bandura's Good Advancement Hypothesis, it is fundamental to convey a sense of right and wrong to a child from a scriptural perspective. Without proximity to the Bible in their lives from an early age, they may not have the patterns or verbal exchanges from Heavenly Father to use as a source of perspective when they are in their basic leadership process on what is good and bad. there is no vision, people are unrestrained, but happy is he who keeps the law. "Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay Turiel's hypothesis has conviction The framework that ethical quality cares about harm, of well-being and reasonableness. The child's mental, social and good work at the same time when leading the child to his own ethical quality, also expresses that young children participate in social norms, e.g. , agreeableness (hence learned behavior While Bandura's hypothesis expresses that children consider the people around them as models, copy this behavior and explore different avenues about it, adults can show the same). ways in which they can place themselves in the situation of others and remember how they feel in comparable circumstances. This is what made me identify with Bandura's social learning hypothesis. Elliot Turiel and Albert Bandura both believed that ethical improvement begins at a young age. Furthermore, in the context of social improvement, there is a distinction between ethical quality and social tradition. Good and bad or good choices are based on the impacts of others and how they feel; the social tradition being decided, it must occur for society to cooperate. Elliot's exploration stops and Albert continues to expand. He believed that introducing young children to role models, verbal discourse, and controlling experiences would influence how they determine what is good and bad. It will also help them decide how they respond to environmental improvements and the types of conditions they seek for themselves. Since Jesus is our infinitely informed source, we must follow him, his statement, and his works. If our ethical development begins at a younger age at this point, the more we begin to manifest after Jesus, the better we will then be able to understand what is good and bad. Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom paper from our expert writers now.Get a Custom EssayI plan to use a ton of open minutes for teaching in my classroom. Depending on the circumstances, have dialogues and discussions in class to find out if the activity was the right one. At this point, give students the opportunity to talk about what would have been a more appropriate activity. Additionally, I can help students develop a sense of right and wrong by displaying excellent practices and praising my student when they do the same. I will have discussions about why we are doing..