A magician gives the illusion that doves have appeared out of nowhere but are simply hidden in his sleeves waiting to be released. The deception is similar to how Obama frames his statements in the 2013 State of the Union address. Obama is a master at denouncing his opposition to a flawed moral compass. When Obama delivers his speech, he appears to favor bipartisanship, but he uses contradictory statements to prove that he simply wants his own agenda to be outdated. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Obama uses contradictory and united language throughout his speech as he addresses various issues at hand. For example, when he says: "We don't need bigger government, we need smarter government that sets priorities and invests in broad-based growth." » Who would dispute this statement? In most minds, smarter equals better. He just showed that we can be smarter by investing in broad-based growth. This seemingly innocent statement becomes a very biased request. The way Obama skirts around what he's trying to say, to make people believe he just wants the best for the country. It also uses inclusive language such as “we” to give the listener a sense of unity. It's a very emotional way to portray the emotional side of viewers, since people aspire to make intelligent decisions. People have this innate feeling of accomplishment when they make smart decisions. The reason this is actually quite tricky is that by simply accepting the phrase and agreeing without question, people don't actually become smarter, but simply do what they are told. Later in the speech we will address the issue of the Second Amendment. , which states that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed," according to Encyclopedia Britannica. When Barack Obama talks about this issue, he acts as if he is simply calling for a vote on the issue. “If you want to vote no, that’s your choice. But these proposals deserve a vote. » Opening the debate by saying that he practices passive aggressiveness in his speech, which has been a constant subtext in the statement. “Because in the two months since Newtown, more than a thousand birthdays, graduations, and anniversaries have been stolen from our lives by a bullet from a gun.” this text is essential for the reader to agree with Obama. The basis of what he just said is that anyone voting “no,” which Obama says is “your choice,” would cause these tragedies to continue. He uses this internal guilt to steer Congress towards his path, associating negative emotions with the alternative. He then takes a personal, relevant situation and demonstrates to the audience how important voting correctly becomes. “Hadiya's parents… [are] in this room tonight, alongside more than two dozen Americans whose lives have been torn apart by gun violence. » Having Congress physically face the people affected by the law in question creates a personal conflict that voters might face. The Newtown disaster is brought up to remind Congress of what the current situation with gun laws has done for them. “Of course, what I said tonight doesn’t matter if we don’t come together to protect our most precious resource: our children.” Finally, the weapon.