Without a doubt, television is the most used medium for obtaining information. But despite the important role played by electronics, some television shows have raised ethical concerns, particularly in the entertainment field. This article reveals the dirty traits individuals possess to stay in power and the manipulation of journalistic integrity. At the expense of others, some individuals engage in all sorts of morally inappropriate actions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay One such TV show that has taken a place on Netflix is ​​“House of Cards”. The first season, the first episode of this TV show puts the political world on stage and captures the imagination of viewers in a real-life situation. In the first season, House of Cards, episode one, the main character of the film is Francis Underwood who sheds light on issues of politics, race and gender, corruption and integrity in journalism (House of Cards and Philosophy Journal, 1-2). Frank Underwood is a morally bad person who calls into question the moral realism of the series. In fact, the TV show portrays him as a manipulative and murderous person. In the first season, episode 1 of this television show, Congressman Frank Underwood participates in the campaign for president who promises him an executive position upon his accession to power. But unfortunately, the situation does not go as planned and we see Mr. Underwood the victim of a betrayal, having failed to obtain the nomination of Secretary of State. This is where the drama begins to unfold with ruthless themes as 'Underwood attempts to use his position of influence to exact revenge on those who stopped him from rising to power with the help from his wife, Claire Underwood, and political journalist Zoe Barnes. » Other characters in the series with leading roles in season one, episode one are an ambitious young journalist identified as Zoe Barnes, Frank Underwood's wife identified as Claire Underwood, and Pennsylvania Congressman Peter Russo (Green, 1). In the first season, the main aspect that stands out is the betrayal. The President, Mr. Walker, fails to honor the agreement to appoint Frank as Secretary of State. Instead, he names Senator Michael Kern. This is when Frank and his wife try to get revenge on Walker. The moral dilemma in the first season of House of Cards, the first episode is a manipulation and murder that occurs when Underwood tries to get closer to the president in an attempt to win a cabinet. position. The first instance of manipulation in season one, episode six, occurs when Congressman Peter Russo is arrested in the car with a prostitute. The aspect of corruption and bribery appears in this first season as Frank offers to help Peter Russo cover up the incident by bribing the police for trading loyalty. Another example of manipulation occurs in the first season, the first episode where Underwood begins a symbiotic relationship with a young person. Political journalist Zoe Barnes helped him undermine the president's choice for secretary of state (Green, 3). Congressman Underwood said: “It's all about sex, except sex is about power. » He tells the reporter false stories against Mr. Walker to trigger his downfall, and he does it because of his lust for power. According to my observation, a journalist must exercise proper virtue ethics and must not allow any means of manipulation to transgress hisduty. The theory that applies to the first season of House of Cards is utilitarianism, which is a normative ethical theory that focuses on how an individual's action results in consequences that affect society as a whole (Smith 453-463). Smith further suggests that we can apply the principle of utility in House of Cards to particular actions of Underwood, such as his manipulative means of going back or Underwood's general action rule that includes how his influence directly impacts society. According to the principle of utilitarianism, the right act is the one that produces the best results (Ladd 467-496). This policy may be used to determine the validity of the rules of conduct. or the moral principles of “House of Cards”. So, good and bad actions are defined as following or breaking these rules. For example, Underwood deemed it appropriate to generate “unjust rules” to achieve cultivated happiness overall, at the expense of mistreating certain individuals. “He is manipulating Peter Russo to help undermine Walker’s choice for Secretary of State.” Russo already knew his fate, and as Underwood drives him home, he asks him, "When has your help ever helped me?" When Russo attempts to reveal his connection to Underwood's schemes, Underwood kills him and alleges suicide as the cause of his death. It was his plan all along, to create a vacancy in political office in such a way that he would influence Walker to nominate him for vice president. Another aspect of utilitarian theory occurs in House of Cards, season one, episode one when a young reporter, Zoe, continues to investigate Underwood's plan. As a protective measure, Underwood lures Zoe to a secure subway station without eyewitnesses or security cameras and pushes her toward an oncoming train. Frank breaks the rules at the cost of taking an individual's life to achieve his general happiness. After Zoé's death, the entire team leading the investigation abandons the mission, which leaves Frank the privilege of continuing his manipulation plan. Another incredible theory we can learn from “House of Cards” season one, episode four, is the element of feminist ethics. Aristotle asserts that men are by nature superior and women inferior. Rousseau also says that women are wrong to complain about the inequality of man-made laws (Fieser and Stumpf 274-278). This isn't surprising news in House of Cards. The women on this show have suffered greatly from threats, limitations, rape, discrimination, loss of autonomy and even death. For example, Frank Underwood's rise to influential roles is the result of such exploitation. He exploits women, kills strangers so that his family can survive and prosper in life. In the television series "House of Cards", the first season depicts Frank's wife, Claire, as a co-conspirator in furthering her husband's scheme. Apparently, Claire brings the aspect of feminist ethics through the terrible things she does to the other female characters. In the TV show, Claire illegally cancels a former employee's health insurance in an attempt to deny her medication needed for her fetus. She does this to encourage the woman to dismiss her wrongful dismissal lawsuit. In another case, Claire knows that her husband is sleeping with a 22-year-old journalist in an attempt to persuade her to drop the investigation. Claire agrees with her husband's plan to destroy the young journalist, and he ends up killing her, a condition in which Claire could have avoided protecting another woman. Another significant example of feminist ethics occurs when.