Table of ContentsThe Struggle to Care for LennieSelf-Preservation and Fear of ConsequencesMercy and a Tragic EndConclusionFrom the opening pages of John Steinbeck's classic novel, Of Mice and men, it is clear that the bond between George and Lennie is deep and unique. However, this bond is tested when George is faced with a difficult decision whether or not to kill Lennie. In this essay, we will delve deeper into the reasons behind George's actions and explore the moral implications of his decision. Ultimately, we will argue that George's choice to shoot Lennie was motivated by a combination of mercy, self-preservation, and the desire to spare Lennie a more tragic fate at the hands of others. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayThe Struggle to Care for LennieOne of the main reasons George decided to shoot Lennie stems from the immense responsibility that he feels for the well-being of his friend. Throughout the novel, it becomes apparent that Lennie possesses a childlike innocence and limited mental capacity, which often leads him into situations where he unintentionally causes harm. George realizes that Lennie's actions, although unintentional, can have serious consequences, as evidenced by the Weed incident where Lennie's inappropriate touch led to disastrous consequences. In addition to the potential harm Lennie poses to others, George also recognizes the immense burden of constantly watching. after him. This burden is further amplified by the hardships of the Great Depression, where resources are scarce and survival is a constant struggle. As George himself states: “I have no one. I've seen the guys wandering around the ranches alone. It’s not good” (Steinbeck 13). George's decision to shoot Lennie can be seen as an act of mercy, sparing his friend a life of constant hardship and potential mistreatment. Self-Preservation and Fear of Consequences Although George's love for Lennie is obvious, self-preservation is another important factor in his decision to shoot him. Throughout the novel, it is clear that George recognizes the potential consequences of Lennie's actions, both for him and for Lennie. When Lennie accidentally kills Curley's wife, George realizes that their dream of owning a farm is shattered and their lives will be changed forever. Additionally, George is aware that Lennie's actions will likely lead to his capture or death at the hands of others. This is foreshadowed earlier in the novel when Candy's old dog is put down, as Carlson suggests: "I have no teeth, I'm almost blind, I can't eat." Candy, you can have all the puppies you want. I've had it for so long. . I had him since he was a puppy, herding sheep with him" (Steinbeck 45). In this case, Carlson's insistence on shooting the dog reflects the harsh reality of survival in a world where the weak are rejected. George's decision to shoot Lennie can therefore be seen as an attempt to protect his friend from a similar fate. Mercy and tragic ending Although George's decision to shoot Lennie may seem harsh, it s. is ultimately an act of mercy Throughout the novel, Lennie's actions are motivated by his inability to understand the consequences of his actions and the harm he unintentionally causes. Lennie's death is inevitable, he takes it upon himself to ensure that his friend's end is quick and relatively painless. Additionally, George's choice to shoot., 1993.