Concerns around affirmative action have taken over the modern world and have now sparked greater debate than twenty years ago. While many people support the use of affirmative action for college admissions, in reality the policy unfairly disadvantages students, diminishes the atmosphere of diversity, and creates an admissions gap. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Many arguments among liberals and conservatives have dominated the public over whether or not affirmative motion is equality or opposite discrimination. Institutions have divergent views on what affirmative action entails. For example, the way employers perceive the situation is far from exceptional compared to what it claims to be. Likewise, the judiciary has had its own interpretation of the affirmative movement generally used to make maximum decisions in the courts. On the grounds that affirmative motion is a moral issue, several questions have been raised about its pros and cons for improving fairness in admission. Additionally, questions were asked about the actual position held by the variety, both at the administrative center and in training. The affirmative movement is seen as the right way to ensure that diversity is received and maintained in the workplace and colleges. As such, it helps create tolerant groups that reveal individuals to certain cultures according to particular thoughts, particular to their own. For many supporters of affirmative action, in controlling institutions, they agree that it allows for an honest assessment of candidates by examining their current social inequalities. The goal of positive education in schools is to increase the admission rate of minority businesses who appear underrepresented in society's institutions. According to Bacchi (1996), the sub-example is therefore that of communities with few people who have pursued better education, children of immigrants and students from disadvantaged backgrounds. the high student population in an organization is due to the promotion of an affirmative movement. This provides a great opportunity to study not only from books and professors, but also to study from each other. a few manage to understand the cultural practices and backgrounds of others. The affirmative motion reduces admission requirements for certain minority societies through an initial academic counterbalance for disadvantaged students. It provides a level playing field for all and ensures that disadvantaged individuals from unique communities access it for opportunities, thereby developing equitable livelihoods for all. Opponents of positive discrimination do not forget that it is reverse discrimination. They argue that it is impossible that past discrimination or injustices against a selected minority group can justify current injustice against non-minority organizations (Chavez, 2008). In accordance with the essential bill of rights enshrined in the country's constitution, all people are the same according to the laws of the land and also according to the biblical doctrines which affirm that we are identical in the sight of God. For this reason, humans should be treated as equals and no single option should be extended to others (Skrentny, 1996). Those who benefit from affirmative action have higher academic expectations than their colleagues. This.