"We belong neither to Bangladesh nor to Myanmar. We have no identity in either country." - Zohra Begum (BBC) On August 25, 2017, a Rohingya terrorist group, ARSA, attacked more than 30 police stations, killing soldiers and police officers. Then followed an incident that forced the Rohingya to flee their homes, their villages being burned. The Rohingya crisis, where all the incidents are linked to each other, leaving their common thread to the migration of the Rohingya. The Rohingyas are accused of attacking the Rakhina - ARSA - and the refusal of the government and soldiers for killing the Rohingyas. It all started with a revolt by a Rohingya terrorist group who wanted Rohingya rights, leading to a mass migration of Rohingya – with the loss of many people. A devastating attack that took place, injuring and taking the lives of people, leaving many people in a state of suffering. I would like to return to the Rohingya crisis and examine the different perspectives on this matter. The stakeholders involved that I would like to talk about are Pope Francis and the government involved in this attack. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayI will mainly talk about the influences that happened due to people's faith and the political ideology of the government. "She saw. The little girl saw everything. She tried to lift her brother while he was burning. She couldn't." - Mumtaz (Rebecca Wright) Pope Francis, the current 266th pope of the Catholic Church, showed his courage in defending the Rohingya. Although these 2 groups had different beliefs – religion – the Pope lent a helping hand and gave hope to the people that there would be someone to help them, giving them God's blessing – this is an important action undertaken with the Pope. Pope Francis has already visited Burma and was pressured by the Catholic Church not to say a single word about the Rohingya because it could set the Burmese people on fire because they are 'banned word', while the United Nations human rights organization says otherwise. Last Friday in Dhaka, Pope Francis mentioned the name “Rohingya” for the first time, addressing the persecuted Muslim minority in Myanmar. “The presence of God today is also called Rohingya,” Pope Francis said in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. (Berlinger, et al.) Although he never specifically mentioned the situation the Rohingya found themselves in, "what was considered the forbidden word" was said out loud in front of many people and, indeed , that changed something. This change could involve different religious groups involved with the Rohingya, but could specifically give the wrong impression to some Buddhists and perhaps open a new perspective for Catholics. The pope took action after meeting with 16 Rohingya refugees. (Tom Embury-Dennis, et al.) He listened to the suffering they experienced, such as rape, murder, and the loss of a family member. Even under pressure from the Church, Pope Francis said a word, a word enough to get the people's attention, and did what he thought was right. And it was worth it, because the Rohingya believe that help will come from the Pope and the world, and they are still waiting. “On behalf of all those who persecuted and injured you, I ask for forgiveness. I appeal to your great hearts to grant us the forgiveness we ask for” - Pope Francis to the Rohingya refugees. (Berlinger, et al.)The Myanmar government refuses to recognize the Rohingya as citizens. Indeed, the Rohingyaare descended from farmers in what is now called “Bangladesh”. But following a military coup in 1962, the Rohingya lost their status and were issued foreign identity cards. (Dewan, et al) “Bangladesh also does not consider Rohingyas as Bangladeshis. » (Dewan) The Rohingya are pushed aside because they don't know who they are and what they are supposed to be. Although there appears to have been a peace agreement signed between Rakhine Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims, the attack still took place. Soldiers joined by 50 Rakhine Buddhists and non-Rohingya minorities from outside the village began their massacres against the Rohingya. The government has denied the attack and said it targeted terrorists, ARSA, a Rohingya group that claimed responsibility for the August attack that killed security forces and military posts in Rakhine , causing numerous victims. This targeting of ARSA led to the burning of houses. The majority of Rohingya killed apparently belonged to ARSA. A similar statement was made by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, saying that "furthermore, it was believed that those who fled did so because of their affiliation with terrorist groups and that they had done it to escape the police. » Guardian News) and avoided any discussion of the Rohingya, but did mention the security of the Rakhines. She also appeared to blame terrorists for a “huge iceberg of disinformation.” (Angela Dewan)The government is monitoring and being cautious about the Rohingya - this could prompt some sort of action again - and nothing has yet been revealed at this stage about who is telling the truth. The UN accused the government of being a “classic example of ethnic cleansing”. (Dewan, et al.) “Action will be taken against all persons, regardless of religion, race and political position, who go against the law of the land and violate human rights. » - Aung San Suu Kyi (Slodkowski, et al) Regarding this question, to be honest, I'm not sure how I feel exactly. I thought the government's treatment of the Rohingya was not acceptable after looking at what the Rohingya went through, but then I was concerned about the terrorist group ARSA, who has done similar things before, in attacking the Rakhines, like how the soldiers do to the Rohingyas. At this point I wasn't sure who was doing the right thing or not. There's part of me that says it's right for the government to be cautious about the terrorist group, but another part says there could have been another way to solve this problem other than violence. No one should be treated as if they don't exist. Everyone has an identity, and having that identity stolen from you just makes you lose pride in who you are and all rights to what you can do. The situation itself is really complicated for me, and I understand that there are reasons why the Rohingya cannot obtain citizenship - a military coup - and that it is difficult for citizens and the government to accept the whole identity called “Rohingya” which does not exist. This does not exist in either place. The more research I did on this, the more confused I became about the whole problem. There are still unknown truths hidden, since I'm not even sure if the whole attack was planned with the sole aim of killing the terrorists and if any of the Rohingya who fled the village actually have a connection with the ARSA. Keep in mind: This is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Personalized Essay I Feel.)