The Question of Allowing Women in Military Combat be authorized to participate in military combat? ". Concerns have been raised that women are not physically fit for such jobs. Although women have shown that they can work in every field by being successful and successful in all areas of work, they are still considered unsuitable for certain jobs. Many girls dream of becoming sailors or soldiers and choose this path for their career. Many of them eventually achieve their goal, but although they achieve their goal, they are not allowed to fight in battles. Just like men, women should be allowed to choose how they want to fight for their country based on their strengths. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayThere are approximately 15-20% women who serve in combat. Many countries like the United States and Canada have opposed gender discrimination and motivated women to fight. The Army has seen an increase in the number of women in combat units, including in infantry jobs. But the problem is not limited to North America: the whole world must understand the problem and support it. Also, there should be a physical and mental assessment test and qualified women should be allowed to fight in the fights, this way the stereotype can be broken. Global Citizenship and Gender Discrimination As global citizens, it is our duty to be aware of the issues affecting the world. Gender discrimination is a sensitive issue and there have been many debates and protests about it. There is no doubt that this problem has been resolved and that the majority of countries have opposed it and contributed to its elimination. The majority of countries have developed laws and supported gender equality. However, the issue of women in combat is one of those issues that still needs to be addressed further. Countries like Sweden, Israel and Canada have recently passed laws allowing women to participate in combat and many other countries are still working on it. Combat service is generally considered necessary for promotion to senior officer positions, and depriving female personnel of this experience ensures that very few of them will reach the highest ranks of the military and thus further strengthens the sexism (Freeman, 2014). As a global citizen, it is important to understand problems like these and we should try to think of ways to eliminate them. Furthermore, we must think critically and contribute to creating a better world. Personal and Professional Opinions on Women in Combat Our group firmly believes that while joining a military combat unit requires meeting high requirements, if a person enlisted and placed in the combat field while meeting all requirements physical, gender should not be an obstacle. If a candidate is qualified for a position, their gender is arbitrary. Additionally, allowing mixed forces maintains the strength of the military. The theme “Women in Combat” concerns us not only as a group but also as individuals. This is a question that deserves to be addressed.pay attention, because at some point in our lives we may find ourselves, our family, our friends or our neighbors finding this to be a problem. Therefore, this problem needs to be addressed more and should be eliminated from our society and make it a better world.IdeologiesCapacityWomen in combat is a sensitive topic that scandalizes strong and immediate responses. This topic relies more on deeply ingrained dominant ideologies and stereotypes about gender and the nature of war. Women's equality in combat under the same rules as men is a troubling idea to many people. However, gender discrimination practiced by the military is a serious topic that deserves careful consideration. Stereotypes are those fixed ideas about the abilities and attributes of women and men and how they should handle this based on their sex. The contradiction between stereotypes about women and the attributes necessary for military roles can be disadvantageous if women do not possess the required masculine traits and if they possess feminine attributes that disqualify them for a combat mission. According to gender stereotypes, women and men are different on many psychological, physical and social dimensions related to military performance. Physical differences are the most common justifications for preventing women from participating in combat missions. “The fact that the average woman is smaller and weaker than the average man doesn't say much about a woman's potential performance in military combat.” When given proper training and the opportunity to prove themselves, military women demonstrated the required physical capabilities. Additionally, “in most close-quarters combat, a gun is the great equalizer.” physical disparities. Since much of modern combat uses digital technologies, computers, long-range weapons, and advanced electronics, technical specialization has become more important than physical power. In fact, physical abilities occupy a modest place among the range of qualities required by the modern fighter. Additionally, if women do not have the physical capabilities required for a specific combat role, the military should not eliminate all women from all combat tasks. In fact, even if physical qualifications are examined, women and men should have the same opportunity to demonstrate the required physical abilities. On the other hand, women's unique physical characteristics could be an asset. For example, a small and agile female soldier may be easier to maneuver in a small area or in vehicles, which is a useful capability in some frontline positions. Feminist scholars, including Judith Stiehm (1983), have argued that eliminating women from combat can result in an unequal society. divided between those who are protected and those who protect. Liberal feminists believe that the best way to ensure equal treatment of women with men is to recognize them as equals to men, including in the military (Jones 1984). A second theory proposes that due to psychological differences between the sexes, this may lead to women being excluded from the military. Because women lack the aggression essential for combat and are less combative than men. Generalizations about the psychological traits of each gender should not classify all women into a single group while ignoring specific characteristics. As noted in the case of physical abilities, even if a specific attribute is more true for femaleor the average man, this fact alone cannot be determinative of an individual's ability. In fact, some women might acquire increased aggression through indoctrination and training, particularly if this attribute was essential in a life-or-death situation. PatriarchyThere are other underlying power structures that contribute to the subordination of women within the military. These questions go beyond questions of physical capacity and psychological reasons; they are more specifically linked to questions of sexuality and patriarchy embodied in military structures and practices. Modern military forces are predominantly made up of men. Additionally, sexism is rife in military training and military life. Soldiers are trained to be violent, aggressive, tough and “masculine”. They are trained to deny the feminine characteristics of support, tenderness and cooperation. Allowing women to play combat roles still confronts patriarchy, a social structure and ideology that provides context and justification for the discrimination of women. One of the ideological aspects of patriarchy is the imposition of strict concepts of gender roles. These conceptions are used to justify discrimination against women. This socialization of men to aspire to the characteristics of a "good" soldier always contrasts with the socialization of women. In a patriarchal system, with a hierarchical structure of domination and submission, women must be at the bottom of the hierarchy. ladder. By proving his “manhood,” a man proves that he is neither a woman nor a child. Therefore, patriarchy and militarism define feminine traits as opposed to masculine traits. If male soldiers are aggressive and courageous, then female soldiers must be the opposite; tender, weak and in need of protection. This reinforces the power and strength of the male soldier. The masculinity of war depends on the false belief that women should be protected. Structures Government Canada is one of the countries with the highest percentage of women serving in the military in the world. Among its allies, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) are considered a leader in military gender integration. Women can enter any career and serve in any CAF environment. Across all sectors, CAF men and women have been selected to train, promote, display and all career opportunities equally - based on rank, diploma and merit. Participation and contribution of women to Canadian military history for over 100 years. With the exception of service on submarines which was finally lifted by the Royal Canadian Navy on March 8, 2000, women have been present in every industry for 20 years. After the department considered the recommendations of the Royal Committee on the Status of Women, the role of women within the CAF began to expand in 1971 into non-traditional areas: vehicle operators and mechanics, aircraft mechanics, air traffic control, military police and firefighters. The ministry changed its policy to allow women to serve at sea on additional ships and in diving operations, in battalions serving in the army, in military police platoons and ambulance units, as well as in most Air Force squadrons, after the ministry revised its personnel policies. In 1978 and 1985, Congress passed the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Women who served in the Navy, Army and Air Force experienced many difficulties.

Essay / The Question of Allowing Women in Military Combat be authorized to participate in military combat? ". Concerns have been raised that women are not physically fit for such jobs. Although women have shown that they can work in every field by being successful and successful in all areas of work, they are still considered unsuitable for certain jobs. Many girls dream of becoming sailors or soldiers and choose this path for their career. Many of them eventually achieve their goal, but although they achieve their goal, they are not allowed to fight in battles. Just like men, women should be allowed to choose how they want to fight for their country based on their strengths. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayThere are approximately 15-20% women who serve in combat. Many countries like the United States and Canada have opposed gender discrimination and motivated women to fight. The Army has seen an increase in the number of women in combat units, including in infantry jobs. But the problem is not limited to North America: the whole world must understand the problem and support it. Also, there should be a physical and mental assessment test and qualified women should be allowed to fight in the fights, this way the stereotype can be broken. Global Citizenship and Gender Discrimination As global citizens, it is our duty to be aware of the issues affecting the world. Gender discrimination is a sensitive issue and there have been many debates and protests about it. There is no doubt that this problem has been resolved and that the majority of countries have opposed it and contributed to its elimination. The majority of countries have developed laws and supported gender equality. However, the issue of women in combat is one of those issues that still needs to be addressed further. Countries like Sweden, Israel and Canada have recently passed laws allowing women to participate in combat and many other countries are still working on it. Combat service is generally considered necessary for promotion to senior officer positions, and depriving female personnel of this experience ensures that very few of them will reach the highest ranks of the military and thus further strengthens the sexism (Freeman, 2014). As a global citizen, it is important to understand problems like these and we should try to think of ways to eliminate them. Furthermore, we must think critically and contribute to creating a better world. Personal and Professional Opinions on Women in Combat Our group firmly believes that while joining a military combat unit requires meeting high requirements, if a person enlisted and placed in the combat field while meeting all requirements physical, gender should not be an obstacle. If a candidate is qualified for a position, their gender is arbitrary. Additionally, allowing mixed forces maintains the strength of the military. The theme “Women in Combat” concerns us not only as a group but also as individuals. This is a question that deserves to be addressed.pay attention, because at some point in our lives we may find ourselves, our family, our friends or our neighbors finding this to be a problem. Therefore, this problem needs to be addressed more and should be eliminated from our society and make it a better world.IdeologiesCapacityWomen in combat is a sensitive topic that scandalizes strong and immediate responses. This topic relies more on deeply ingrained dominant ideologies and stereotypes about gender and the nature of war. Women's equality in combat under the same rules as men is a troubling idea to many people. However, gender discrimination practiced by the military is a serious topic that deserves careful consideration. Stereotypes are those fixed ideas about the abilities and attributes of women and men and how they should handle this based on their sex. The contradiction between stereotypes about women and the attributes necessary for military roles can be disadvantageous if women do not possess the required masculine traits and if they possess feminine attributes that disqualify them for a combat mission. According to gender stereotypes, women and men are different on many psychological, physical and social dimensions related to military performance. Physical differences are the most common justifications for preventing women from participating in combat missions. “The fact that the average woman is smaller and weaker than the average man doesn't say much about a woman's potential performance in military combat.” When given proper training and the opportunity to prove themselves, military women demonstrated the required physical capabilities. Additionally, “in most close-quarters combat, a gun is the great equalizer.” physical disparities. Since much of modern combat uses digital technologies, computers, long-range weapons, and advanced electronics, technical specialization has become more important than physical power. In fact, physical abilities occupy a modest place among the range of qualities required by the modern fighter. Additionally, if women do not have the physical capabilities required for a specific combat role, the military should not eliminate all women from all combat tasks. In fact, even if physical qualifications are examined, women and men should have the same opportunity to demonstrate the required physical abilities. On the other hand, women's unique physical characteristics could be an asset. For example, a small and agile female soldier may be easier to maneuver in a small area or in vehicles, which is a useful capability in some frontline positions. Feminist scholars, including Judith Stiehm (1983), have argued that eliminating women from combat can result in an unequal society. divided between those who are protected and those who protect. Liberal feminists believe that the best way to ensure equal treatment of women with men is to recognize them as equals to men, including in the military (Jones 1984). A second theory proposes that due to psychological differences between the sexes, this may lead to women being excluded from the military. Because women lack the aggression essential for combat and are less combative than men. Generalizations about the psychological traits of each gender should not classify all women into a single group while ignoring specific characteristics. As noted in the case of physical abilities, even if a specific attribute is more true for femaleor the average man, this fact alone cannot be determinative of an individual's ability. In fact, some women might acquire increased aggression through indoctrination and training, particularly if this attribute was essential in a life-or-death situation. PatriarchyThere are other underlying power structures that contribute to the subordination of women within the military. These questions go beyond questions of physical capacity and psychological reasons; they are more specifically linked to questions of sexuality and patriarchy embodied in military structures and practices. Modern military forces are predominantly made up of men. Additionally, sexism is rife in military training and military life. Soldiers are trained to be violent, aggressive, tough and “masculine”. They are trained to deny the feminine characteristics of support, tenderness and cooperation. Allowing women to play combat roles still confronts patriarchy, a social structure and ideology that provides context and justification for the discrimination of women. One of the ideological aspects of patriarchy is the imposition of strict concepts of gender roles. These conceptions are used to justify discrimination against women. This socialization of men to aspire to the characteristics of a "good" soldier always contrasts with the socialization of women. In a patriarchal system, with a hierarchical structure of domination and submission, women must be at the bottom of the hierarchy. ladder. By proving his “manhood,” a man proves that he is neither a woman nor a child. Therefore, patriarchy and militarism define feminine traits as opposed to masculine traits. If male soldiers are aggressive and courageous, then female soldiers must be the opposite; tender, weak and in need of protection. This reinforces the power and strength of the male soldier. The masculinity of war depends on the false belief that women should be protected. Structures Government Canada is one of the countries with the highest percentage of women serving in the military in the world. Among its allies, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) are considered a leader in military gender integration. Women can enter any career and serve in any CAF environment. Across all sectors, CAF men and women have been selected to train, promote, display and all career opportunities equally - based on rank, diploma and merit. Participation and contribution of women to Canadian military history for over 100 years. With the exception of service on submarines which was finally lifted by the Royal Canadian Navy on March 8, 2000, women have been present in every industry for 20 years. After the department considered the recommendations of the Royal Committee on the Status of Women, the role of women within the CAF began to expand in 1971 into non-traditional areas: vehicle operators and mechanics, aircraft mechanics, air traffic control, military police and firefighters. The ministry changed its policy to allow women to serve at sea on additional ships and in diving operations, in battalions serving in the army, in military police platoons and ambulance units, as well as in most Air Force squadrons, after the ministry revised its personnel policies. In 1978 and 1985, Congress passed the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Women who served in the Navy, Army and Air Force experienced many difficulties.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch