blog




  • Essay / Roman Icon Analysis: Was Julius Caesar a Good Ruler

    Julius Caesar (reigned 46-44 BC), a name known worldwide by many today, is the one of the leaders of different countries still called Caesar, a title which carries great honor. This name has gained a respect never before achieved. Julius Caesar, an iconic Roman ruler, gained this fame because he possessed many of the understated characteristics of a leader. His armies loved him and his contemporaries hated him because he was impossible to beat, leading to questions about whether Julius Caesar had been a good general for Rome, or whether everyone had been blinded by the sense of power that he had imitated to everyone he had. came into contact with. From what historians have gathered, the type of person he had been is revealed, showing that he cared not only for his soldiers, but also for the lower class (a characteristic that any ruler should not only to have but to embody) and that he also had the means to do so. to be a powerful political leader, thus showing that Julius Caesar had indeed been a good leader. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay Although Julius Caesar may appear politically capable and a great general, many believe otherwise, believing that in reality he had many of the characteristics that had made him a rather poor leader. Some tend to believe that in his campaign in Gaul he had been rather ostentatious and that instead of being a success for Rome, he had actually been on a mission to massacre his "tax-paying" trading partners, who had essentially been the key factory in his crossing to Gaul. German territory, an event some call when Caesar "started a great war by crossing a small stream." A second factor that caused many to doubt Caesar was his selfish character, in the sense that he declared himself dictator for life, even though this was something Rome had never done before. When he ascended to this role, he took it upon himself to cancel the elections of Rome's representatives, and the only ones allowed to be elected to the office of consul had to be personally chosen by Caesar himself. He used his power to set a precedent for the future of Rome, and he did so in a way that would only benefit him. One of the main factors that led people to believe that Caesar had been a bad leader was his ambition. He was said to be corrupt and only coveted power, which in turn affected his leadership and his ties with the citizens slowly deteriorated over time. Many believe that he sought more every time he reached a new stool, always craving more power, no matter how much he had already laid down. This caused him to be extremely well received, which affected his thinking and made him think only of himself rather than the people he was supposed to lead. These accusations against Caesar, to put it mildly, are incorrect and invalid, because they do not matter. statutory evidence to support them and prove their accuracy. What some see as ruthless killing (his Gallic campaign against so-called tax-paying citizens) had actually been a defense mechanism to save Rome. Gaul had been invaded by the Helvetii, then a Germanic tribe, and Caesar had to subdue the rest of Gaul to put an end to the growing threat4. To counter the dictatorship during this period, a constitution had never been used before, as it was only created for extreme emergency situations. He had not been elected dictator for life, but ratherfor 5 years, then 10 years, then for life. This shows that people continually voted for him because they trusted him, and that he didn't just take the position himself. He did not let his own desires cloud what was best for Rome, as evidenced by the fact that he stabilized the rate at which debts were to be repaid (interest), making it possible to repay debts and not not subject citizens to difficulties. a life constantly in debt. Although people can believe what they want, in the end it is obvious that Caesar accomplished so much in such a short time. He achieved many successes on the battlefield and brought new opportunities to citizens. His political actions may seem self-centered to some, but there is no denying the amount of hope he gave Rome and the fact that so many great leaders emerged after him, all hoping to maintain his legacy. Julius became so well-liked thanks to his charming charm that he radiated to both his soldiers, his citizens, and even those who opposed him. When we look at the period that Caesar was in power, it is extremely obvious that everyone who served him and remained loyal ended up retiring with a good chunk of money in their pocket – certainly enough to live comfortably . He knew how to handle the challenges he faced and maintain the strong aura surrounding him even in times of uncertainty. Studies show that he might have suffered from a condition called epilepsy, but these difficulties did not influence the way he implemented his ideas and exercised his leadership duties. During his presidency, it was said that Caesar personally knew every name of the soldiers in his army, which would have created a bond on a more personal level, thereby boosting the trust of his navy. This type of bond between leader and member would have reduced the gap and allowed soldiers to be more confident in their general's ability to lead them to victory. In turn, Julius' thoughtfulness towards the lower class and Rome as a whole is another factor that made him such a remarkable leader. Using his power as a leader, Caesar initiated numerous social reforms that helped the lower class gain some form of stability. He banned extortion, which had been one of the main concerns of this period, and also established a standard calendar (on which our current calendar is based). He also instituted the Acta Diurna, a document sent to the public making it possible to better know what the government had to say on different issues. Furthermore, he found a way to reduce unemployment and offered the poor a new life in the overseas Roman colonies, which not only benefited the poor but also himself. The lower class was able to start fresh in a new environment, and Caesar had his new colonies settled by Roman citizens. Caesar dreamed of a better Rome and, to do so, began construction of new buildings that would improve the appearance of the city, partly because he thought Rome seemed rather bland in comparison to Alexandria (which was at the considered the best city in the entire Mediterranean). Not only did Caesar's characteristics support why he was a good leader, but also the defense tactics and methods he used to protect Rome. He achieved many military successes and said these successes helped him rise to political power. He had been, to say the least, a force to be reckoned with, he managed to conquer lands like no other, first succeeding in conquering Gaul (his greatest achievement.